[release-1.10] chore(lightspeed): upgrade fast-uri in lightspeed to >= 3.1.7

[JessicaJHee]

Hey, I just made a Pull Request!

fast-uri in lightspeed is vulnerable due to CVE-2026-84394, CVE-2026-84292, CVE-2026-76172, CVE-2026-75975, CVE-2026-75931, CVE-2026-75899, CVE-2026-6322. Fix by upgrading to versions >= 3.1.7.

Fixed with simple yarn up -R fast-uri

Which issue(s) does this PR fix

• Fixes RHIDP-16772
• Fixes RHIDP-16764
• Fixes RHIDP-16641
• Fixes RHIDP-16632
• Fixes RHIDP-16622
• Fixes RHIDP-16595

✔️ Checklist

• A changeset describing the change and affected packages. (more info)
• Added or Updated documentation
• Tests for new functionality and regression tests for bug fixes
• Screenshots attached (for UI changes)

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (release-1.10/lightspeed@c478d27). Learn more about missing BASE report.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                    Coverage Diff                     @@
##             release-1.10/lightspeed    #4577   +/-   ##
==========================================================
  Coverage                           ?   60.96%           
==========================================================
  Files                              ?     2098           
  Lines                              ?    65167           
  Branches                           ?    16942           
==========================================================
  Hits                               ?    39726           
  Misses                             ?    25219           
  Partials                           ?      222           

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
adoption-insights	83.58% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
ai-integrations	70.03% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
app-defaults	69.60% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
augment	69.36% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
bulk-import	72.86% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
cost-management	16.49% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
dcm	32.85% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
extensions	61.79% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
global-floating-action-button	74.30% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
global-header	61.68% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
homepage	50.95% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
konflux	91.01% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
lightspeed	68.13% <ø> (?)
mcp-integrations	81.59% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
orchestrator	36.36% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
quickstart	62.88% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
sandbox	79.56% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
scorecard	83.58% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
theme	64.54% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
translations	8.49% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c
x2a	78.28% <ø> (?)		Carriedforward from 230b90c

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c478d27...9290f6d. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.