State transition changes - #39
Open
rchillyard wants to merge 37 commits into
Open
Conversation
Assingment 2
…nto Spring2023
…nto Spring2023
…nto Spring2023
…nto Spring2023
…from argument parameters
SPGameCreator now takes three generic types rather than just the Board generic type. MultiPlayerGame: makes the G type as Object. Runner: game type (for Player, etc.) is Board_Grid_Array rather Sudoku SinglePlayerGame * now has second generic type: G; * constructor is different SPGameCreator takes three generic types; SUdokuCreator: added compile problems
Sudoku game now runs (although I'm not sure if it is successful). A move is actually a series of (board) state transitions; So, MoveProcessor has been renamed StateTransition; Various other fixes, including the logic in Board_Grid.move;
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Runner now runs for the Sudoku game.
I'm not sure if it actually works, but at least it doesn't throw an exception.
If you, Mehul, have made any changes to the code, I would recommend you merge them into this branch (rather than the other way around).