Repository navigation
[IMP] stock_analytic: sync with OCA upstream - #279
Open
AungKoKoLin1997 wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
AungKoKoLin1997 wants to merge 2 commits into
AungKoKoLin1997 wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Takes OCA/account-analytic@cdc63a6c30d4 (16.0). Local i18n/ is kept.
Vendored from OCA/account-analytic@065f4dd (16.0)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Brings
stock_analyticup to OCA/account-analytic 16.0 tip (16.0.1.1.0→16.0.1.4.0). No OCA PRs are applied on top: all of our OCA PRs for this module are merged upstream (OCA/account-analytic#528, #586, #641, #653, #703).The drift audit classified this module as both. Each local change turned out to be an earlier form of something now in OCA:
_get_scoreinanalytic_applicability.py: the local copy was taken from an early revision of #586, which review changed before it merged. With the merged version, an applicability that sets an Operation Type no longer matches callers that pass nopicking_type. Stock moves always pass one._get_custom_move_fieldsinstead of overriding_get_stock_move_values.analytic_distribution(#653), a fix for thestock_valuationaccount (#703), and the analytic column in the receipt move tree.Dependents checked: the overrides in
stock_lot_analytic(axls-custom) andpurchase_stock_analyticare unaffected. The locali18n/is kept.Refs https://github.com/qrtl/qrtl-dev-tools/issues/38
🤖 Generated with Claude Code