Skip to content

[4207][IMP] stock_owner_restriction: reflect oca changes - #177

Open
AungKoKoLin1997 wants to merge 3 commits into
16.0from
16.0-reflect-oca_stock_owner_restriction
Open

AungKoKoLin1997 wants to merge 3 commits into
16.0from
16.0-reflect-oca_stock_owner_restriction

Conversation

@AungKoKoLin1997

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AungKoKoLin1997

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The tests failed is related with stock_move_actual_date we fixed at qrtl/sfaj-oca#16.
In this axls-oca, I will not create fix PR at the moment because the open PRs are not needed to merge urgently.
If odoo doesn't fix the issue until some PR needs to get merged, I will create to fix the issue.

nobuQuartile
nobuQuartile previously approved these changes Mar 14, 2025

@nobuQuartile nobuQuartile left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
Code review and functional review

@nobuQuartile
nobuQuartile force-pushed the 16.0-reflect-oca_stock_owner_restriction branch from d9e53d0 to d3c09b5 Compare April 13, 2025 23:35
@AungKoKoLin1997 AungKoKoLin1997 changed the title [4207][UPD] stock_owner_restriction: reflect oca changes [4207][IMP] stock_owner_restriction: reflect oca changes Jun 24, 2025
_compute_restrict_partner_id reads move_dest_ids.picking_id.owner_id and
picking_id.partner_id via _get_owner_for_assign(), but these were not in
@api.depends. As the field is stored, the value could go stale when the
destination picking owner or the picking partner changes.
@AungKoKoLin1997

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Pushed 99ddc8f, the latest commit of OCA/stock-logistics-workflow#1854 (3dda44e9, "complete restrict_partner_id dependencies"), so this branch now matches the current #1854. Refs https://github.com/qrtl/qrtl-dev-tools/issues/38

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants