v0.11.0

[Paebbels]

New Features

• Added landscape feature for wider tables like unittest summary and code coverage summary to render them in LaTeX as landscape pages.
  • Added new Landscape docutils node.
  • Added new Transformation to add a special CSS class, which is used by the LaTeX writer to setup correct column spaceings on big tables.
  • Added LaTeX and HTML modules for writer specific handling of docutil notes.
  • Registered pdflscape as a LaTeX requirement.

Changes

• Bumped dependencies.
• Dropped Python 3.11 support due to Sphinx 9.1 dropping Python 3.11 support.
  • Debian 12 Bookworm uses Python 3.11.
  • Debian 12 Trixie uses Python 3.13.
  • Ubuntu 22.04 uses 3.10.
  • Ubuntu 24.04 uses 3.12.
  • Ubuntu 26.04 uses 3.14.

Bug Fixes

• Fixed table spacing.
• Fixed usage of _CreateSingleTableHeader.

Documentation

• Build documentation as PDF.
• Fixed SVG vs. PNG mistakes for HTML vs. LaTeX.
• Fixed wrong cross-references (UNITTEST → UNITTESTING, DOCCOV → DOCCOVER, CODECOV → CODECOVER).

[codacy-production]

Not up to standards ⛔

🔴 Issues 12 minor

Alerts:
⚠ 12 issues (≤ 0 issues of at least minor severity)

Results:
12 new issues

Category	Results
Documentation	10 minor
CodeStyle	2 minor

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 7 complexity · -4 duplication

Metric	Results
Complexity	7
Duplication	-4

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage 67.35% diff coverage

Metric	Results
Coverage variation	Report missing for 20331901
Diff coverage	✅ 67.35% diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (2033190)	Report Missing	Report Missing	Report Missing
Head commit (2b86090)	1438	558	38.80%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#86)	98	66	67.35%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

¹ Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 67.34694% with 32 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 38.59%. Comparing base (2033190) to head (2b86090).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
sphinx_reports/Workaround.py	38.88%	11 Missing ⚠️
sphinx_reports/__init__.py	76.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
sphinx_reports/CodeCoverage.py	16.66%	5 Missing ⚠️
sphinx_reports/DocCoverage.py	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
sphinx_reports/LaTeX.py	86.66%	2 Missing ⚠️
sphinx_reports/Unittest.py	77.77%	2 Missing ⚠️
sphinx_reports/Dependency.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #86      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   36.70%   38.59%   +1.89%     
==========================================
  Files          11       15       +4     
  Lines        1365     1438      +73     
  Branches      146      154       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits          501      555      +54     
- Misses        861      880      +19     
  Partials        3        3              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	38.59% <67.34%> (+1.89%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.