Skip to content

docs: add 2.0 engineering readiness audit - #129

Merged
psimaker merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/engineering-readiness-audit
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

docs: add 2.0 engineering readiness audit#129
psimaker merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/engineering-readiness-audit

Conversation

@psimaker

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What & why

Close the final engineering-readiness audit gating the 2.0.0 release train: D021–D025 gap matrix, per-leg evidence states (upload, download, roundtrip, cleanup — never merged), full compatibility matrix, security/privacy/secret and wire review, existing-user/migration/rollback review, helper/relay rollout and downgrade matrices, and the staged app rollout with abort criteria.

Physical-device evidence is recorded as not executed — owner-approved physical-device waiver (2026-07-15) with the simulator and isolated Syncthing substitute evidence. No claim in the audit is stronger than the recorded per-leg evidence; VaultSync 2.0 stays NO-GO until the release-readiness checklist, relay deploy, and staged rollout complete.

Component(s)

  • docs only

Testing

Record the closed D021-D025 gap matrix, per-leg evidence states with
the deferred cleanup carrier and its bounded residue, the full
compatibility and rollout/downgrade matrices, the security/privacy/
secret review, and the staged-rollout abort plan. Physical-device
evidence is recorded as not executed under the owner-approved waiver
with its simulator and isolated Syncthing substitute evidence.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@psimaker, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 7 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 78fba8ea-19b2-4dd1-ac69-84964c84fab7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 948b6ec and ca14316.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/engineering-readiness-2.0.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch agent/engineering-readiness-audit

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@psimaker
psimaker marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2026 11:03
@psimaker
psimaker merged commit a126ac9 into main Jul 15, 2026
18 checks passed
@psimaker
psimaker deleted the agent/engineering-readiness-audit branch July 15, 2026 11:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant