Skip to content

feat: Implement Action-Alignment Loss Architecture - #100

Merged
projectedanx merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/action-alignment-loss-12667561082401712463
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

projectedanx merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/action-alignment-loss-12667561082401712463

Conversation

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Added ActionAlignmentLoss PyTorch module to bind predicted utility to executed policy.
  • Added comprehensive unit tests against the Rock, Paper, Scissors 'Nash Trap'.
  • Authored ADR 31 to formalize the architecture.
  • Documented three key research prompts for future deployment.
  • Updated LEXICON.md with the formal definition of Action-Alignment Loss.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 12667561082401712463 started by @projectedanx

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@projectedanx
projectedanx merged commit 54c82fc into main Sep 20, 2026
2 checks passed
@projectedanx
projectedanx deleted the feat/action-alignment-loss-12667561082401712463 branch September 20, 2026 19:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant