docs: update readme for missing nerdydata source - #726
Conversation
Neo - PR Security ReviewNo security issues found Comment |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe README.md help text now includes ChangesDocumentation
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 93: Update README to fully document the NerdyData integration end-to-end:
add the -nd, -nerdydata flag to all command/flags tables and examples, include
"nerdydata" as an option in the -e, -engine list/description (referencing the
-e, -engine flag and the -nd, -nerdydata flag), and add a new subsection in the
configuration/API-key section describing how to obtain and set the NerdyData API
key (include the env var or config field name used by the codebase and an
example of usage in commands/examples that use -nd). Ensure the docs contain a
brief example command showing -nd with a sample query file and a note about
where to place the API key so users can configure it end-to-end.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
5ac3c55 to
09b7e76
Compare

-nd, -nerdydataflag to the search engine options inREADME.mdto indicate support for NerdyData queries.Summary by CodeRabbit