Improve scoop

[dczulada]

Pull requests into Cypress require the following. Submitter and reviewer should ✅ when done. For items that are not-applicable, note it's not-applicable ("N/A") and ✅.

Submitter:

• This pull request describes why these changes were made.
• Internal ticket for this PR:
• Internal ticket links to this PR
• Code diff has been done and been reviewed
• Tests are included and test edge cases
• Tests have been run locally and pass

Reviewer 1:

Name:

• Code is maintainable and reusable, reuses existing code and infrastructure where appropriate, and accomplishes the task’s purpose
• The tests appropriately test the new code, including edge cases
• You have tried to break the code

Reviewer 2:

Name:

• Code is maintainable and reusable, reuses existing code and infrastructure where appropriate, and accomplishes the task’s purpose
• The tests appropriately test the new code, including edge cases
• You have tried to break the code

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 85.10638% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 89.11%. Comparing base (92e068a) to head (df7b3c0).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
lib/cypress/scoop_and_filter.rb	83.33%	7 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2065      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.71%   89.11%   -2.61%     
==========================================
  Files         159      159              
  Lines        7340     7369      +29     
==========================================
- Hits         6732     6567     -165     
- Misses        608      802     +194     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.