Add Chinese translation for organizing-code-with-functions.mdx

[Chiuye]

Summary

This PR adds a full Chinese (zh-CN) translation of the Organizing Code with Functions tutorial.

Notes

• Requesting review from: @limzykenneth, @lirenjie95
• Happy to revise as needed

(Waiting to link to a new issue?)

[Chiuye]

@lirenjie95 Hi, sorry I'm a newcomer contributing to an open-source GitHub project for the first time, so I might not be familiar with some aspects. 😥😣
I tried creating a new branch in my forked repository and submitting a PR with commits from that branch. Is that the right way to do it?
Besides, I'm not quite sure how to create an issue. Should I put all language translations of the "Organizing Code with Functions" tutorial in one issue, or just the Chinese version I'm currently translating? And is there a fixed template or format for creating translation-related issues? Since I'm uncertain, I haven't created a new issue yet.
Could you please help check? I would greatly appreciate it. 😣🙏

[lirenjie95]

Hi @Chiuye, thanks for your contribution! The translation looks great overall. I've noted a few places that read a bit awkward for your reference.
Regarding the issue attached to this PR — it's required for the main p5.js repo, though I didn't see it as a strict requirement for p5.js-website. Let's leave it as is. Feel free to tag the maintainer for merging once I've approved your new changes.

[ksen0]

Hi @Chiuye and welcome! In general, we do prefer that there's an issue before a PR, but of course we consider on a case by case basis. No worries.

@Divyansh013 is the i18n steward overall and can be tagged too. I think we are focusing now on the more basic tutorials, but since this translation has already been proposed and reviewed, I think it is fine to merge it when it's done. But if it should wait fo something, or if it duplicates any work, please let us know @Divyansh013

[lirenjie95]

Looks nice, approved!

[Chiuye]

Hi @lirenjie95, I've updated the translation following your feedback and added a few changes based on my own understanding. Could you please review it again?🥰
Additionally, I found a small issue (see line 680 in Chinese version): the comment line above the trees() function says "draw two trees", but instead there are three trees in the trees() function. I have opened issue #1319 for this. @ksen0

[ksen0]

Looks good to me! Tagging @doradocodes to merge when you're next doing triage, and to determine whether cherrypicking to 2.0 is applicable here, I think this tutorial is the same in the 2 site versions but I'm not 100% sure