Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
116 changes: 95 additions & 21 deletions components/mastermap/mastermap-data.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -581,59 +581,133 @@ export const PROJECTS: ProjectData[] = [
category: "private-writes",
status: "Active",
statusVariant: "active",
completion: 10,
completion: 40,
description:
"Institutional Privacy Task Force. PoCs, architecture reviews, workshops, market map.",
href: "/mastermap/iptf",
tags: ["Institutional", "PoCs", "Workshops", "Market Map"],
now: [
{
name: "PoCs (2-3)",
name: "PoCs (7 shipped)",
description:
"3 weeks dev time per PoC. Usable demo slices. Validate institutional demand for privacy.",
status: "Planned",
statusDot: "yellow",
"Private Bonds (3 approaches: UTXO+ZK, Aztec L2, FHE), Private Transfers (shielded pool), Plasma Stablecoins, DIY Validium (RISC Zero), TEE Cross-Chain Atomic Swap. Each with blog write-up and open-source code.",
status: "Done",
statusDot: "green",
},
{
name: "Architecture Reviews",
name: "Privacy Market Map v0.3.0",
description:
"Phased technical review of confidentiality architectures across blockchain ecosystems.",
status: "Planned",
statusDot: "yellow",
"Open-source knowledge base: 58 patterns, 12 approaches, 25 vendors, 22 use cases. CROPS evaluation framework, CI validation, external contributions.",
status: "Done · Ongoing",
statusDot: "green",
},
{
name: "Workshops (2-3)",
name: "Blog Series (10 posts)",
description:
"Targeted engagement with institutional stakeholders. Capture constraints and build trust.",
status: "Planned",
statusDot: "yellow",
"Published on iptf.ethereum.org: Private Bonds (3 parts), Public Rails vs Private Ledgers, Private Transfers, Plasma Stablecoins, DIY Validium, TEE Atomic Swap (2 parts), Cypherpunk & Institutional Privacy.",
status: "Done",
statusDot: "green",
},
{
name: "Workshops & Engagement",
description:
"3 workshops delivered. Reached 14 financial institutions, 17 tech companies, 9 government orgs. 33% conversion rate on institutional outreach.",
status: "Done · Ongoing",
statusDot: "green",
},
{
name: "Survive Track (3 PoCs)",
description:
"Adversarial resilience sprint testing I2U protections: escape hatches, force withdrawal, rugpull protection. Feeds directly into CROPS I2U scoring.",
status: "In progress",
statusDot: "green",
},
],
next: [
{
name: "Privacy Market Map Updates",
name: "Guide v0 (Web Product)",
description:
"Keep the market map growing. Maintain contribution momentum.",
status: "Ongoing",
statusDot: "green",
"Persona-routed web app on iptf.ethereum.org. Pattern cards with CROPS visuals. Approach pages as case studies. Entry points for Legal, Risk, Business, and Technical personas.",
status: "Mid-May 2026 · Critical",
statusDot: "yellow",
},
{
name: "Reports & Specifications",
name: "PoCs (3-4 new)",
description:
"Explainer documents building toward \"State of Institutional Privacy\" marquee report.",
status: "Planned",
"Mix of institutional and resilience PoCs. Candidates: encrypted mempool, PIR in shielded pool, private money market fund, private derivatives, PQ shielded pool.",
status: "Q2 2026",
statusDot: "yellow",
},
{
name: "End-User Privacy Protections",
description:
"Map patterns that cover end-user privacy against institutions: escape hatches, force withdrawal, rugpull protection, viewing-key limits.",
status: "Q2 2026",
statusDot: "yellow",
},
{
name: "Workshops & Institutional Engagement",
description:
"2+ workshops lined up, plus deeper second-tier engagements. Broadening reach to governments, NGOs, and central banks alongside financial institutions. Push for public collaboration announcements. Expand communications beyond crypto Twitter to LinkedIn and business journals.",
status: "Q2 2026",
statusDot: "yellow",
},
],
later: [
{
name: "Specifications Repository",
description:
"Formal specification lifecycle for institutional privacy primitives. Scope decision pending: institutional specs vs broader access layer specs.",
status: "H2 2026",
statusDot: "gray",
},
{
name: "State of Institutional Privacy",
description:
"Marquee report with benchmarks, comparisons, and institutional landscape analysis.",
"~50-page marquee report: use cases, approaches, PoC summaries, benchmarks. Physical copies for Devcon.",
status: "H2 2026",
statusDot: "gray",
},
],
details: {
description: [
"Help institutions and enterprises adopt Ethereum with robust privacy protections",
"Turn the privacy market map into a product: guide, one-pagers, reports as projections of a single source of truth",
"Expand coverage to protect end users against institutional adversaries",
],
deliverables: [
"7 PoCs shipped in Q1 with 10 blog posts and open-source code",
"Guide v0 on iptf.ethereum.org with persona-routed entry points",
"End-user protection patterns and resilience PoCs",
],
impact: [
"Institutions have concrete, open-source references for building privacy on Ethereum",
"Ecosystem has a credibly neutral, verified map of privacy solutions and trade-offs",
"End-user protections proven in code alongside institutional privacy",
],
},
kpis: [
{
label: "PoCs shipped",
target: "7 in Q1, ~5 in Q2",
status: "Q1 done · Q2 in progress",
},
{
label: "Map coverage",
target: "58 patterns, 25 vendors",
status: "Ongoing",
},
{
label: "Institutional engagement",
target: "Governments, NGOs, FIs",
status: "Expanding",
},
{
label: "Workshops per quarter",
target: "2-3",
status: "On track",
},
],
},

// ─── Private Reads ───
Expand Down
Loading