Preserving human agency in AI-supported learning.
AI assists. Humans govern. Evidence speaks. Communities validate.
Not robot-first. Trust-first.
OpenLab Agentic Education is a research and prototype framework exploring how learners, educators, families, communities, institutions, and AI agents can co-create and examine learning evidence without surrendering human judgment or learner agency to automation.
It is the public home of the OpenLab / S.A.T. — Skills, Agency & Trust research line on:
- 📜 Proof-of-Learning — inspectable evidence of learning centered on the learner
- 🤝 Human-governed AI — AI may assist Evidence Review; Human Validation remains final
- 🧭 Learner agency — learners can explain, question, challenge, and help govern their evidence record
- 🎖 Recognition — badges or credentials follow validated evidence; they are not the evidence itself
- 🛡 Trust-first governance — privacy, provenance, consent, accessibility, uncertainty, and accountability by design
- ✨ MIRA — Meaningful Intelligence for Reflection and Agency, a proposed learner-facing companion that helps learners reflect and act without becoming their evaluator
Anchor paper: From Co-Intelligence to Proof-of-Learning
Vocabulary:
docs/TERMINOLOGY.mddefines the project's canonical language.
Mission → Learning Claim → Evidence → Reflection / Iteration
↓
AI-assisted Evidence Review
↓
HUMAN VALIDATION GATE
↓
Learning Proof
↓
Recognition → Portfolio → Next Pathway
The goal is not to make learning more machine-readable. The goal is to make learning more human-visible without surrendering human agency.
The project moves through three connected layers, with human governance running through all of them:
flowchart LR
subgraph Research["🔬 Research"]
A[papers/]
B[proposals/]
C[docs/]
end
subgraph Framework["🧭 Framework"]
D[framework/]
E[governance/]
F[missions/]
end
subgraph Prototype["⚙️ Prototype"]
G[agents/]
H[badges/]
I[prototypes/]
J[data/]
end
Research --> Framework --> Prototype
Prototype -. human validation .-> Framework
Framework -. human validation .-> Research
| Layer | What lives here | Folders |
|---|---|---|
| 🔬 Research | Concept papers, proposals, references | papers/ · proposals/ · docs/ |
| 🧭 Framework | Rubrics, learning loops, governance, ethics | framework/ · governance/ · missions/ |
| ⚙️ Prototype | Agent specs, recognition schemas, synthetic evidence review | agents/ · badges/ · prototypes/ · data/ |
gh600/ bridges an external agentic-AI certification track to the OpenLab framework.
Start here:
VISION.md— why this existsMANIFESTO.md— principles we will not compromisedocs/TERMINOLOGY.md— the language of the systemframework/proof-of-learning-rubric.md— PoLR v0.1agents/mira.md— MIRA prototype specificationROADMAP.md— where this is goingpapers/— research grounding
git clone https://github.com/porroto/Agentic-Education.git
cd Agentic-Education- Educators →
framework/ - Researchers →
papers/andproposals/ - Builders →
agents/andprototypes/— synthetic data only
- ✅ Synthetic and de-identified examples only — no real student data belongs in this repo
- ✅ Human Validation is final — AI reviews, questions, organizes, and suggests; people validate
- ✅ Minimum necessary evidence — more learner data is not automatically better evidence
- ✅ Classroom pilots require applicable school policy compliance, consent/permission processes, and ethics review
- ✅ Recognition, not speculation — badges/credentials represent validated learning evidence and are not financial instruments
- ❌ No financialized learning tokens for children
- ❌ No hidden behavioral, biometric, emotional, or psychological profiling
- ❌ No AI system gets to declare the human's learning complete
- Learners who deserve agency over how their learning is represented
- Teachers designing evidence-based, project-driven classrooms
- Researchers studying human-AI collaboration and learning
- Builders who believe student agency is non-negotiable
- Communities & families who belong in the trust conversation
- Concept paper: From Co-Intelligence to Proof-of-Learning
- Three-layer architecture (Research → Framework → Prototype)
- Canonical terminology v0.1 — Skills, Agency & Trust; Learning Proof; Trust Envelope
- MIRA prototype specification
- PoLR v0.1 review draft
- Evidence Review Agent v0 synthetic adversarial test
- Trust Envelope schema v0.1
- Classroom-safe pilot kit
- Community validation protocol
- Public research brief + call for critique/collaborators
See ROADMAP.md for details.
Contributions, critiques, and classroom perspectives are welcome — especially perspectives that expose where the framework could reproduce grading, surveillance, inequity, or false certainty. Please read CONTRIBUTING.md and our CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md.
See CITATION.cff.
MIT — see LICENSE.
Built by Roger Vargas · STEM educator & founder, S.A.T. Labs / OpenLab
Let's Learn. Lead. Make. 🌎