Skip to content

fix(naming): corrige grafia OminiRTkSync para OmniRTkSync - #25

Merged
logins-pathbit merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/corrige-grafia-omnirtksync
Oct 20, 2026
Merged

logins-pathbit merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/corrige-grafia-omnirtksync

Conversation

@elielsousa-pathbit

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Corrige a grafia do nome: OminiRTkSync -> OmniRTkSync (havia um 'i' a mais depois do 'm').

  • Pacote Python omini_rtksync -> omni_rtksync; comandos, imagem Docker (ghcr.io/pathbit/omnirtksync), cookies, volumes, redes, workflows, docs e testes.
  • OminiRoute -> OmniRoute.
  • Aspas nos placeholders do formulario de bug (YAML invalido rejeitado pelo GitHub).

Validacao local

  • unittest: OmniRTkSync 453 OK / 9RTKSync 446 OK / LiteLlmRTKSync 356 OK
  • tools/valida_docs.py: 0 divergencias
  • Teste de container (testcontainers) com a imagem nova: OK
  • Busca final pelo nome antigo: 0 ocorrencias

O nome tinha um 'i' a mais depois do 'm'. Corrige em todo o projeto:
pacote Python (omini_rtksync -> omni_rtksync), comando, imagem Docker
(ghcr.io/pathbit/omnirtksync), cookies de sessao, volumes, redes,
workflows, documentacao e testes.

Tambem corrige 'OminiRoute' para 'OmniRoute' e as aspas dos placeholders
do formulario de bug (YAML invalido rejeitado pelo GitHub).
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-20T00:58:18.917758Z 1ce0d3c PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@logins-pathbit
logins-pathbit merged commit 0972779 into master Oct 20, 2026
6 checks passed

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1ce0d3c43f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
name: ominirtksync-stack
name: omnirtksync-stack

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Preserve the existing Compose project identity on upgrade

For users upgrading an existing Compose deployment, changing this top-level name makes Compose treat the file as a separate application; Docker prefixes unnamed volumes with the project name, so omniroute_data changes from ominirtksync-stack_omniroute_data to omnirtksync-stack_omniroute_data and the gateway starts against an empty database, while the old containers may also retain the fixed host ports. The documented upgrade command therefore cannot preserve the state it claims survives upgrades. Keep the legacy project/physical volume identity or provide an explicit volume migration before changing it. Docker documents both project resource isolation and project-prefixed volume names.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants