Pin langchain community to 0.4.2#2976
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough
ChangesDependency constraint update
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@pyproject.toml`:
- Line 126: Add a preceding comment for the temporary langchain-community
version pin in the dependency list to explain that it is a workaround for the
ragas evaluation failure. Reference the relevant upstream issue/bug in the
comment, and state the exact condition for removing the pin once that bug is
fixed. Keep the comment adjacent to the pinned entry so future maintainers can
find it when reviewing the dependency declaration.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: 7eae69b5-3122-40f6-8658-5fe5da6c7486
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
uv.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock,!uv.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pyproject.toml
|
@JoaoFula rebase? |
9887ef0 to
94028b0
Compare
|
/retest |
|
@JoaoFula: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Description
pinning langchain version to avoid ragas error in eval
Temporary workaround until there is a fix for vibrantlabsai/ragas#2741. Without fix, eval is broken.
Type of change
Related Tickets & Documents
Checklist before requesting a review
Testing
Summary by CodeRabbit