Adding note about complete affiliation#598
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Vanessa Sochat <vsochat@stanford.edu>
|
Is the CI for this working, or did the edits to the text really cause the failures? |
|
I suggest the idea in this PR be incorporated into the documentation. |
|
Sorry for being slow to reply to this.
I don't believe this is a JOSS requirement. I know @kyleniemeyer likes it but I don't think JOSS requires it :-) |
|
I do prefer to see a complete affiliation, to match what other journal articles require/expect. But I guess not everyone else agrees... |
|
I think asking for more doesn't hurt, if anything it would make reviewers lives easier that do have this preference. Some subset of users / reviewers that don't require it would likely not even notice the change to the documentation. I can see adjusting the language a little bit to soften that it's not a hard requirement, e.g.,
|
|
Let me know if you like the wording there or would want changes - I can update the PR here! |
For the paper affiliation, I wasn't aware that anything beyond the University was required, as the current example has primarily the institution (and that the author is a fellow) and I've submit about ~6 papers with no affiliation beyond Stanford University. However I learned in this review that the expectation is to have a complete department, institution, state, and country. I didn't find this anywhere in documentation or examples, so if the writer of the paper is expected to have it, he/she needs to have it clearly stated. This PR will do that - updating the example to include it, and adding the note in the list of required elements.
Signed-off-by: Vanessa Sochat vsochat@stanford.edu