Repository navigation
Security-Review nennt den Grund, wenn Claude Code ohne Bericht endet - #28
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Der erste Lauf endete nach einem Zug mit Exit 1, und das Protokoll sagte nicht, warum.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Der erste Lauf des Security-Reviews (opengewerk/opengewerk-haustechnik#224) endete nach einem Zug mit Exit 1 und ohne Bericht, und das Protokoll sagte nicht, warum. Endet Claude Code mit einem Fehler, schreibt der Schritt jetzt Art und Text des Fehlers ins Protokoll: das Ergebnis der Sitzung und jede Meldung mit einem Fehler der API, gekürzt auf 600 Zeichen. Der übrige Verlauf bleibt aus dem öffentlichen Protokoll, er enthält, was der Agent gelesen und ausgeführt hat.