Skip to content

Experiment: trace display queries before camera patches - #6

Closed
oliverames wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/experiment-basefrom
codex/experiment-aspect-tracing
Closed

oliverames wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/experiment-basefrom
codex/experiment-aspect-tracing

Conversation

@oliverames

@oliverames oliverames commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

This is a fork-only experiment targeting codex/experiment-base. Keep it isolated from main and the existing upstream PR heads. The switch is off by default.

What and why

A literal aspect scan cannot establish camera control. Previous framebuffer/aspect experiments were ineffective or stretched the picture. DM_ASPECT_TRACE=1 adds only the missing bounded trace of actual guest default-display-resolution queries and their change-event binding. Existing VI/NVN crop, swapchain, viewport and PASSDUMP diagnostics supply the other boundaries.

There is no crop/stretch/fill mode, resolution-answer override or guessed camera patch. The next capture requires the exact game build, a confirmed world vertex-shader key and projection/attachment evidence before changing camera math.

Checked

  • 20 actual registered-hook checks on Mac and Newt, iOS 27.2; existing OE tests: 38 checks.
  • Stock resolution answers, nullable outputs, event arguments, bounded records and independent VI geometry/crop remain unchanged. Native event binding is stubbed.
  • Native probe build, source documentation/environment checks and focused Python lint pass.
  • No game camera, projection patch, physical Duo or native-aspect gameplay route was tested.

Docs

  • Reproducible world-projection investigation and exact-build requirements documented in docs/aspect-tracing.md.
  • No game files, keys or extracted game data.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-29T01:38:20.600621Z 414db02 PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-29T01:39:36.329797Z 414db02 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@oliverames

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Closing: experiment evidence and testing are tracked in the upstream nxnative PRs, so the fork-only experiment copy comes down. Keeping the branch here for reference.

@oliverames oliverames closed this Nov 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant