Skip to content

Add ogc.osc.prov-processing-step: PROV profile for a single geospatial processing step - #14

Open
nsnarayanam wants to merge 5 commits into
ogcincubator:masterfrom
nsnarayanam:clean-pr-1786112949.15880
Open

Add ogc.osc.prov-processing-step: PROV profile for a single geospatial processing step#14
nsnarayanam wants to merge 5 commits into
ogcincubator:masterfrom
nsnarayanam:clean-pr-1786112949.15880

Conversation

@nsnarayanam

Copy link
Copy Markdown

D104 (Aganitha) contribution toward Activity 1. Supersedes #13, which was built from an earlier branch — same content plus the JSON-LD bindings below.

A profile of ogc.ogc-utils.prov constrained to a single geospatial processing step. Adds a required processType property linking the step to a registered process type - the link PROV-O and OGC API - Processes Part 5 (26-038) do not themselves provide, and the point where the profile-plus-register pattern closes.

Inputs and outputs are entity references per the PROV-O object model; roles are carried in qualifiedUsage. Both examples validate locally (2/2).

Design question rather than a settled call: processType is bound to dct:type so the value resolves as a governed concept rather than a plain string, following the steer not to mint terms where existing ones will do. A dedicated ospd: property would be more precise than "type" — happy to change if the group prefers that. Worth deciding once rather than per-block.

parameters is deliberately left unbound in the context: how parameters should be typed depends on whether process types are registered coarsely or as parameterised subtypes, which is still open.

Process-type URIs are placeholders pending D110/D111.

Notes:

@nsnarayanam nsnarayanam changed the title Add ogc.osc.prov-processing-step: PROV profile for a single geospatial processing stepClean pr 1786112949.15880 Add ogc.osc.prov-processing-step: PROV profile for a single geospatial processing step Aug 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant