-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
feat(dav): add IRoomMetadata::BUILDING_NAME #63244
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Rikdekker
wants to merge
1
commit into
nextcloud:master
Choose a base branch
from
Rikdekker:feat/room-building-name
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+11
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, So you are adding a dav property. But where is the implementation of this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question — there is no implementation to add here, because the metadata pipeline is already generic.
AbstractPrincipalBackendstores whatever keys a backend returns fromIRoom::getAllAvailableMetadataKeys()incalendar_rooms_md, andsearchPrincipalsByMetadataKey()handles arbitrary keys in itsdefaultbranch. OnlyFEATURESandCAPACITYneed special cases, because they are a list and a numeric range rather than a plain string.BUILDING_ADDRESS,BUILDING_STORYandBUILDING_ROOM_NUMBERhave no implementation either — they are defined inIRoomMetadataand nowhere else in server, and reach clients through that generic path.BUILDING_NAMEbehaves exactly the same.So this PR is a shared vocabulary entry rather than a feature: without it, backends and clients cannot agree on a key name for something both sides already have.
Producer — RoomVox 1.3.0 publishes this property today. It holds the building as its own field, so it can emit the real name instead of leaving clients to guess. It currently uses the literal string, since there is no constant to reference; if this lands, that becomes
IRoomMetadata::BUILDING_NAMEwith no change to the key itself.Consumer — nextcloud/calendar#8264 adds a room browser to the Calendar room picker that groups rooms per building. It currently derives the building name from
BUILDING_ADDRESSby taking the segment before the first comma, plus a special case to skip postal codes. That heuristic exists purely because there is no key to read, and it is wrong often enough to matter: on a 113-room instance, 51 rooms group under a postal code instead of a building.Happy to open a follow-up on the Calendar side that prefers
BUILDING_NAMEwhen a backend supplies it and keeps the address heuristic as a fallback — that felt like it belonged in a separate PR rather than this one.