Skip to content

Bump project version to 1.0.1#8

Merged
msteinert merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bump-to-1.0.1
Jul 19, 2025
Merged

Bump project version to 1.0.1#8
msteinert merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bump-to-1.0.1

Conversation

@rdmark

@rdmark rdmark commented Jul 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This is an underhanded way to say that I would love a stable 1.0.1 release so that there's a canonical tarball that I can reference in the Meson subproject wrapper in Netatalk. :)

At the same time, I left the library soversion at 1.0.0 because the ABI hasn't changed since the 1.0.0 release version.

@rdmark rdmark changed the title Bump library version to 1.0.1 Bump project version to 1.0.1 Jul 19, 2025
@msteinert msteinert merged commit 18bd1f6 into main Jul 19, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
@msteinert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Should I bother uploading an Autotools tarball?

@rdmark rdmark deleted the bump-to-1.0.1 branch July 19, 2025 20:13
@rdmark

rdmark commented Jul 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

I personally don't have a use for an autotools tarball!

But it would be nice to have a xz compressed tarball that meson creates, to shave a few kbs off the size.

After running meson setup, you do:

meson dist -C build

This runs the distribution tests and then leaves you a nice xz tarball under build/meson-dist

@msteinert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@rdmark

rdmark commented Jul 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Perfect, thanks! It's working: Netatalk/netatalk#2268

Now for some reason, the sha256 checksum file doesn't match the checksum of the xz tarball. I had to use GitHub's checksum instead. I wonder what happened?

@msteinert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The sha256sum seems OK here?

$ sha256sum -c bstring-1.0.1.tar.xz.sha256sum
bstring-1.0.1.tar.xz: OK

@rdmark

rdmark commented Jul 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Never mind you're right it is correct. I must have been hallucinating yesterday.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants