Repository navigation
feat(browser): reuse saved response values across scenario steps - #7267
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 275854261e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
Contributor
 [High impact] The reviewed changes appear safe to merge; no blocking defect was found. SummaryThis PR lets browser scenarios save response values and reuse them in later URLs, JSON bodies, and authentication headers.
Diagram%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart LR
A[JSON response] --> B[Read bounded response values]
B --> C[Save named strings and numbers]
B --> D[Protect marked response values]
C --> E[Later URL, JSON or header]
D --> F[Retained Evidence]
E --> G[Next scenario request]
Reviews (8) · Last reviewed commit: "docs: record final upstream reconciliati..." · Reviewed by Greptile |
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This was referenced Oct 26, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 92b1f1cc87
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
…esponse-values # Conflicts: # src/domain/analysisView/EnvironmentStateWriteSimulation.test.ts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 9920a9a39d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 12534c95e6
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
Owner
|
Thanks for integrating and crediting #7162. That PR now has later commits than the upstream head named in this description, including review follow-ups. Could you coordinate with its author and account for those changes in the comparison before choosing a single review path? Both proposals remain open during that reconciliation. |
5 of 22 tasks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 4a57f392fe
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ed110935f5
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
|
Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits. |
Collaborator
Author
|
@codex review |
|
Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits. |
Collaborator
Author
|
@earakely-scale I fetched and compared your current #7162 head The query spelling and refused-slug source pinning both exposed gaps here: the three imported regressions fail on This reconciles the latest upstream follow-ups for the integrated review path. The final focused/static/build checks are running; all 15 earlier actionable threads were fixed and resolved. A further Codex review request was refused by the repository's review-usage limit, which will be recorded as a verification gap. No human-review declaration is being filled. |
Co-authored-by: Edgar Arakelyan <edgar.arakelyan@scale.com>
|
Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits. |
5 of 14 tasks
earakely-scale
added a commit
to earakely-scale/rea
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2026
…lues change rewrites Main's morluto#7267 changes the lines beside the blank-member docs and the empty-spelling check in explainUpdate. Setting them aside lets that merge apply cleanly; the commit after it puts them back on top of main's text. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Oct 27, 2026
morluto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2026
* feat(environment): serve the writes callers make without recorded form fields
- A create member a recording sent empty ("", null, false, [] or {}) is no
longer required; a call that leaves it out is applied as sending that value
(body.blank).
- List views render envelope members that list the listed entities' ids
(Paperless's `all`), so creates in such collections are confirmed.
- Updates move their entity in collections kept sorted by a field they write,
and a failed whole-collection read after an update can teach that order.
- A later create that stores an unruled field otherwise is withheld at the
create, and an item read may fill values a create's answer had not loaded.
- An unsent field respelled between null, [] and {} is unchanged.
- The skill asks for one create with every field and one with only what a
person must give.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(skill): show how to read signed-in pages before recording
Agents guessed capture keys (artifacts, dom, final) to see pages behind
sign-in, which inspect_web_page cannot reach.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): accept every empty spelling recorded creates sent
A create that fills only what a person must give sends `null` where the
full create sent a string, and `null` or `false` for the same flag. The
merged plan now accepts each recorded empty value, and a call that leaves
the member out is applied as the earliest call sent it.
Also adds the spec folder for this change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(skill): keep the vary-fields step neutral on UI or API writes
Agents read "the form" as a cue to write through the UI, where some
applications' request bodies are not exposed; a body-unusable UI write
now re-records once with request steps.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(environment): record verification for blank members and sorted writes
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): address review of blank members and sorted writes
- Bulk updates move their entities in turn against the others' earlier
values and install the final order once, as replay does.
- A member's recorded empty values stay accepted once a later call teaches
its default; a left-out member with a default keeps the default.
- Write answers spell empty lists and maps as their recorded answers did.
- A rename can teach a sort when the creates chose one by a field the
update did not write, such as ids that ascend with titles.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat(environment): serve the writes that later reads explain
- An item read whose object is marked deleted (deleted, isDeleted or
is_deleted true) agrees with an absent entity, as EspoCRM answers a
deleted record; such an object never seeds or adopts an entity.
- maxSize, max_results and maxResults are page sizes, for whole-collection
list lines and the list query's limit role.
- An item view also shows the fields only reads after its type's first write
show, when no initial entity holds them (Vikunja's task subscription),
without requiring them; write answers leave such a field out for entities
without it, and it no longer withholds the write as incomplete-entities.
- The skill asks updates to change the fields a person would change, and
expects a deleted object to read back as 404 or marked deleted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): answer sent empty members as sent, and keep a placed create's order
- A write answer spells an empty list or map the call did not send as its
recorded answer did; one the call sent is answered as sent, so a create
sending `[]` is not answered `null` because the first recorded create was.
- A read listing the whole collection that placed a create leaves the create
only the sorted inserts whose order that read follows, so a later rename
cannot teach a sort an earlier read ruled out.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): answer bulk updates without fields only later reads show
A bulk update's answer renders each entity with the same allowance a single
update's answer has: a field only reads after the type's first write showed,
which no initial entity holds, is left out for an entity without it, so a
bulk update of a seeded task is no longer refused for lacking it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(environment): correct how the EspoCRM contact update task passes
The agent trajectories show gpt-oss passes it by creating a replacement contact
and deleting the original, since the served update refuses emailAddress; the
update itself is refused in both builds.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): answer a read of a served-deleted entity marked deleted
An application that soft-deletes still answers a deleted record by id, marked
deleted. Serving now keeps an entity a served delete removed from a type whose
recorded item reads show that, until a reset or load and within the size
data/add loads, and answers a read of it with its last fields and the flag
true, instead of refusing the read.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): keep unloaded create answers, check bulk answers with sent members, narrow inserts only on collection-order reads
- A create whose item read loaded values its answer had not records them
(`observation.read.unloaded`), and a served create's answer keeps them as
the recorded answer showed them, a zero-time owner included, while the state
holds the read's.
- Replay checks a bulk update's recorded answers with each target's sent
members, as serving answers them, so echoed `null` and `[]` no longer make
the plan body-unusable.
- A whole-collection read whose query sorts it shows the query's order, so it
no longer narrows a create's sorted insert candidates.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(environment): record the census with main's unknown-clock rule merged
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): learn a sort from a rename only when moving its entities reaches it
Serving moves only the entities a write changes in a collection kept sorted,
so replay now tries a sort after a rename only when the entities no write the
read exercised changed already follow it. Seeded folders listed out of title
order no longer teach a title sort that serving would answer with another
order.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): keep unloaded create answers a sent value did not echo, and learn no sort from query-sorted reads
- A served create keeps a value its recorded answer had not loaded unless the
call sent that member and the plan stores it as sent, so a create sending
`active: false` is answered `false` as recorded while the state holds the
read's `true`.
- A rename no longer teaches a sort from a whole-collection read its query
sorts, whose ties need not follow the collection's own order.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): learn the soft-delete flag in the state view and serve by it
Extraction now records the member later item reads set true on a record the
application soft-deleted, and the item view carries it as `deleted_flag`.
Serving reads that fact instead of scanning recorded bodies itself, so one
owner decides what a soft delete looks like.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): learn the soft-delete flag from item reads with a query too
A client may read a deleted record back only with a query, such as a
cache-busting parameter. Every successful read of the item tool now shows the
flag; only plain later reads still add fields.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): learn sorts only from orders a list read confirmed
- A sort retry after a failed whole-collection read requires the entities no
write changed since a list last showed them to follow it already, rather than
excusing every entity the update's tool ever wrote: an earlier rename a list
confirmed in place stays where it was.
- An update takes its creates' sort only from a create a list read showed
placed; replay still tries a sort a create guessed from the initial order.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): drop entities read back as deleted and answer soft deletes as deleted
- A held entity a later read shows marked deleted is dropped, not adopted with
the marked object's fields.
- Bulk-update replay renders answers with the optional and later-only fields
serving uses, so a bulk update of created and seeded entities replays.
- A served delete of a soft-deleting type answers with the entity marked
deleted, single and bulk.
- A deleted flag only query reads showed is a field of the item view, so a
served tombstone keeps it where live records omit it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): move updated entities only by placed sorts and keep query-sorted reads from confirming order
Replay moved an updated entity by a sort a create only guessed, while the
update plan exported only placed sorts, so a read could confirm an update
by a move serving would not make. Both now use the placed sort. A passing
list read clears its entities from the moved set only when the state
decides the order of every entity it lists, so a read whose query sorts
it no longer hides an earlier move from a later sort check.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): try a learned sort by moving each pending write in turn, as serving does
#retrySort sorted the whole collection, which a list could match while
serving, moving each renamed entity in turn against the others' values
before their own writes, gave another order. The state now records the
values each write replaced, and the retry replays the writes since a
list in collection order last showed their entities.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): answer a served delete with the deleted flag its recorded answer showed
An application may answer a delete with the record as it was and mark it
deleted only on later reads. Delete answers, single and bulk, now take
the flag's value from the recorded answer; reads of a served-deleted
entity still show it marked deleted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* chore(environment): set aside two hunks next to lines main's saved-values change rewrites
Main's #7267 changes the lines beside the blank-member docs and the
empty-spelling check in explainUpdate. Setting them aside lets that merge
apply cleanly; the commit after it puts them back on top of main's text.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* chore(environment): restore the set-aside hunks on main and bump the skill to 51
Puts the blank-member docs and the empty-spelling check back beside main's
slug and composed text and heldSlugRule. Main is at skill 50 with
different text, so this branch's skill changes take 51.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* chore(environment): bump the skill to 52 above #7260's 51
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): keep sorts a list showed in place ruled out, and created answers' nested members as recorded
A whole list in collection order that showed a renamed entity where a
sort by the renamed field would have moved it now rules that sort out, so
a later rename of the same entity cannot teach it. A create's answer
leaves out members its item read added inside an object the answer
showed, as the recorded answer did; the state still stores them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(environment): compare soft-deleted read fields
* fix(environment): preserve initially deleted item observations
* fix(environment): index stored deleted entities separately
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: morluto <76467478+morluto@users.noreply.github.com>
morluto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2026
…m fields (#7260) * feat(environment): serve the writes callers make without recorded form fields - A create member a recording sent empty ("", null, false, [] or {}) is no longer required; a call that leaves it out is applied as sending that value (body.blank). - List views render envelope members that list the listed entities' ids (Paperless's `all`), so creates in such collections are confirmed. - Updates move their entity in collections kept sorted by a field they write, and a failed whole-collection read after an update can teach that order. - A later create that stores an unruled field otherwise is withheld at the create, and an item read may fill values a create's answer had not loaded. - An unsent field respelled between null, [] and {} is unchanged. - The skill asks for one create with every field and one with only what a person must give. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(skill): show how to read signed-in pages before recording Agents guessed capture keys (artifacts, dom, final) to see pages behind sign-in, which inspect_web_page cannot reach. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): accept every empty spelling recorded creates sent A create that fills only what a person must give sends `null` where the full create sent a string, and `null` or `false` for the same flag. The merged plan now accepts each recorded empty value, and a call that leaves the member out is applied as the earliest call sent it. Also adds the spec folder for this change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(skill): keep the vary-fields step neutral on UI or API writes Agents read "the form" as a cue to write through the UI, where some applications' request bodies are not exposed; a body-unusable UI write now re-records once with request steps. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(environment): record verification for blank members and sorted writes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): address review of blank members and sorted writes - Bulk updates move their entities in turn against the others' earlier values and install the final order once, as replay does. - A member's recorded empty values stay accepted once a later call teaches its default; a left-out member with a default keeps the default. - Write answers spell empty lists and maps as their recorded answers did. - A rename can teach a sort when the creates chose one by a field the update did not write, such as ids that ascend with titles. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): answer sent empty members as sent, and keep a placed create's order - A write answer spells an empty list or map the call did not send as its recorded answer did; one the call sent is answered as sent, so a create sending `[]` is not answered `null` because the first recorded create was. - A read listing the whole collection that placed a create leaves the create only the sorted inserts whose order that read follows, so a later rename cannot teach a sort an earlier read ruled out. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): keep unloaded create answers, check bulk answers with sent members, narrow inserts only on collection-order reads - A create whose item read loaded values its answer had not records them (`observation.read.unloaded`), and a served create's answer keeps them as the recorded answer showed them, a zero-time owner included, while the state holds the read's. - Replay checks a bulk update's recorded answers with each target's sent members, as serving answers them, so echoed `null` and `[]` no longer make the plan body-unusable. - A whole-collection read whose query sorts it shows the query's order, so it no longer narrows a create's sorted insert candidates. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): learn a sort from a rename only when moving its entities reaches it Serving moves only the entities a write changes in a collection kept sorted, so replay now tries a sort after a rename only when the entities no write the read exercised changed already follow it. Seeded folders listed out of title order no longer teach a title sort that serving would answer with another order. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): keep unloaded create answers a sent value did not echo, and learn no sort from query-sorted reads - A served create keeps a value its recorded answer had not loaded unless the call sent that member and the plan stores it as sent, so a create sending `active: false` is answered `false` as recorded while the state holds the read's `true`. - A rename no longer teaches a sort from a whole-collection read its query sorts, whose ties need not follow the collection's own order. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): learn sorts only from orders a list read confirmed - A sort retry after a failed whole-collection read requires the entities no write changed since a list last showed them to follow it already, rather than excusing every entity the update's tool ever wrote: an earlier rename a list confirmed in place stays where it was. - An update takes its creates' sort only from a create a list read showed placed; replay still tries a sort a create guessed from the initial order. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): move updated entities only by placed sorts and keep query-sorted reads from confirming order Replay moved an updated entity by a sort a create only guessed, while the update plan exported only placed sorts, so a read could confirm an update by a move serving would not make. Both now use the placed sort. A passing list read clears its entities from the moved set only when the state decides the order of every entity it lists, so a read whose query sorts it no longer hides an earlier move from a later sort check. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): try a learned sort by moving each pending write in turn, as serving does #retrySort sorted the whole collection, which a list could match while serving, moving each renamed entity in turn against the others' values before their own writes, gave another order. The state now records the values each write replaced, and the retry replays the writes since a list in collection order last showed their entities. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(environment): set aside two hunks next to lines main's saved-values change rewrites Main's #7267 changes the lines beside the blank-member docs and the empty-spelling check in explainUpdate. Setting them aside lets that merge apply cleanly; the commit after it puts them back on top of main's text. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(environment): restore the set-aside hunks on main and bump the skill to 51 Puts the blank-member docs and the empty-spelling check back beside main's slug and composed text and heldSlugRule. Main is at skill 50 with different text, so this branch's skill changes take 51. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): keep sorts a list showed in place ruled out, and created answers' nested members as recorded A whole list in collection order that showed a renamed entity where a sort by the renamed field would have moved it now rules that sort out, so a later rename of the same entity cannot teach it. A create's answer leaves out members its item read added inside an object the answer showed, as the recorded answer did; the state still stores them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: morluto <76467478+morluto@users.noreply.github.com>
morluto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2026
…ts (#7332) * feat(environment): serve the writes callers make without recorded form fields - A create member a recording sent empty ("", null, false, [] or {}) is no longer required; a call that leaves it out is applied as sending that value (body.blank). - List views render envelope members that list the listed entities' ids (Paperless's `all`), so creates in such collections are confirmed. - Updates move their entity in collections kept sorted by a field they write, and a failed whole-collection read after an update can teach that order. - A later create that stores an unruled field otherwise is withheld at the create, and an item read may fill values a create's answer had not loaded. - An unsent field respelled between null, [] and {} is unchanged. - The skill asks for one create with every field and one with only what a person must give. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(skill): show how to read signed-in pages before recording Agents guessed capture keys (artifacts, dom, final) to see pages behind sign-in, which inspect_web_page cannot reach. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): accept every empty spelling recorded creates sent A create that fills only what a person must give sends `null` where the full create sent a string, and `null` or `false` for the same flag. The merged plan now accepts each recorded empty value, and a call that leaves the member out is applied as the earliest call sent it. Also adds the spec folder for this change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(skill): keep the vary-fields step neutral on UI or API writes Agents read "the form" as a cue to write through the UI, where some applications' request bodies are not exposed; a body-unusable UI write now re-records once with request steps. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(environment): record verification for blank members and sorted writes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): address review of blank members and sorted writes - Bulk updates move their entities in turn against the others' earlier values and install the final order once, as replay does. - A member's recorded empty values stay accepted once a later call teaches its default; a left-out member with a default keeps the default. - Write answers spell empty lists and maps as their recorded answers did. - A rename can teach a sort when the creates chose one by a field the update did not write, such as ids that ascend with titles. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(environment): serve the writes that later reads explain - An item read whose object is marked deleted (deleted, isDeleted or is_deleted true) agrees with an absent entity, as EspoCRM answers a deleted record; such an object never seeds or adopts an entity. - maxSize, max_results and maxResults are page sizes, for whole-collection list lines and the list query's limit role. - An item view also shows the fields only reads after its type's first write show, when no initial entity holds them (Vikunja's task subscription), without requiring them; write answers leave such a field out for entities without it, and it no longer withholds the write as incomplete-entities. - The skill asks updates to change the fields a person would change, and expects a deleted object to read back as 404 or marked deleted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): answer sent empty members as sent, and keep a placed create's order - A write answer spells an empty list or map the call did not send as its recorded answer did; one the call sent is answered as sent, so a create sending `[]` is not answered `null` because the first recorded create was. - A read listing the whole collection that placed a create leaves the create only the sorted inserts whose order that read follows, so a later rename cannot teach a sort an earlier read ruled out. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): answer bulk updates without fields only later reads show A bulk update's answer renders each entity with the same allowance a single update's answer has: a field only reads after the type's first write showed, which no initial entity holds, is left out for an entity without it, so a bulk update of a seeded task is no longer refused for lacking it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(environment): correct how the EspoCRM contact update task passes The agent trajectories show gpt-oss passes it by creating a replacement contact and deleting the original, since the served update refuses emailAddress; the update itself is refused in both builds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): answer a read of a served-deleted entity marked deleted An application that soft-deletes still answers a deleted record by id, marked deleted. Serving now keeps an entity a served delete removed from a type whose recorded item reads show that, until a reset or load and within the size data/add loads, and answers a read of it with its last fields and the flag true, instead of refusing the read. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): keep unloaded create answers, check bulk answers with sent members, narrow inserts only on collection-order reads - A create whose item read loaded values its answer had not records them (`observation.read.unloaded`), and a served create's answer keeps them as the recorded answer showed them, a zero-time owner included, while the state holds the read's. - Replay checks a bulk update's recorded answers with each target's sent members, as serving answers them, so echoed `null` and `[]` no longer make the plan body-unusable. - A whole-collection read whose query sorts it shows the query's order, so it no longer narrows a create's sorted insert candidates. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(environment): record the census with main's unknown-clock rule merged Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(environment): serve query numbers, counted values and made objects - A query parameter accepts a number or boolean, which serving sends as its JSON text, as agents send page sizes and flags. - A sequence may start at the value its first create took above every value its type held (Vikunja's per-project task index), and a later create's composed, template or started-sequence rule is adopted when it also spells the first create's value. - A made-object rule explains an object the application makes with each created entity: members the request stamped, members holding the entity's own id, and counts one past the held objects' values. - A create's answer names the id of the one object a one-element array member holds, so bulk creates link to their type. - The skill reads each listed object by id before writing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(environment): let a linked create take path values it stores A create linked to its type's own collection, whose path has no parameters, accepts any path values when its plan stores each one in a field, as a Vikunja task stores its project; replay and serving apply it alike. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): learn a sort from a rename only when moving its entities reaches it Serving moves only the entities a write changes in a collection kept sorted, so replay now tries a sort after a rename only when the entities no write the read exercised changed already follow it. Seeded folders listed out of title order no longer teach a title sort that serving would answer with another order. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): keep unloaded create answers a sent value did not echo, and learn no sort from query-sorted reads - A served create keeps a value its recorded answer had not loaded unless the call sent that member and the plan stores it as sent, so a create sending `active: false` is answered `false` as recorded while the state holds the read's `true`. - A rename no longer teaches a sort from a whole-collection read its query sorts, whose ties need not follow the collection's own order. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(environment): verify query values, counted values and made objects Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): learn the soft-delete flag in the state view and serve by it Extraction now records the member later item reads set true on a record the application soft-deleted, and the item view carries it as `deleted_flag`. Serving reads that fact instead of scanning recorded bodies itself, so one owner decides what a soft delete looks like. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(environment): record the call-values checks at #7274 9382102 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): learn the soft-delete flag from item reads with a query too A client may read a deleted record back only with a query, such as a cache-busting parameter. Every successful read of the item tool now shows the flag; only plain later reads still add fields. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(environment): record the call-values checks at #7274 4583240 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): learn sorts only from orders a list read confirmed - A sort retry after a failed whole-collection read requires the entities no write changed since a list last showed them to follow it already, rather than excusing every entity the update's tool ever wrote: an earlier rename a list confirmed in place stays where it was. - An update takes its creates' sort only from a create a list read showed placed; replay still tries a sort a create guessed from the initial order. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): drop entities read back as deleted and answer soft deletes as deleted - A held entity a later read shows marked deleted is dropped, not adopted with the marked object's fields. - Bulk-update replay renders answers with the optional and later-only fields serving uses, so a bulk update of created and seeded entities replays. - A served delete of a soft-deleting type answers with the entity marked deleted, single and bulk. - A deleted flag only query reads showed is a field of the item view, so a served tombstone keeps it where live records omit it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): check made objects as recorded and keep their ids and clocks honest - A made object's clock counts as a write clock, so a capture with no clock anchor withholds the create instead of stamping 1970. - Members holding the entity's identity follow the id written, generated or sent, through the type's id field. - A later create's made object is checked as recorded, before its own members are rewritten, so one naming another entity withholds the plan. - A later create's template is adopted only when it spells that create's value too, not just when the first create's text holds its source value. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): move updated entities only by placed sorts and keep query-sorted reads from confirming order Replay moved an updated entity by a sort a create only guessed, while the update plan exported only placed sorts, so a read could confirm an update by a move serving would not make. Both now use the placed sort. A passing list read clears its entities from the moved set only when the state decides the order of every entity it lists, so a read whose query sorts it no longer hides an earlier move from a later sort check. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(environment): count six withheld plans that explain more, not seven The bulk task create counted among them is served on this branch. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): try a learned sort by moving each pending write in turn, as serving does #retrySort sorted the whole collection, which a list could match while serving, moving each renamed entity in turn against the others' values before their own writes, gave another order. The state now records the values each write replaced, and the retry replays the writes since a list in collection order last showed their entities. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): answer a served delete with the deleted flag its recorded answer showed An application may answer a delete with the record as it was and mark it deleted only on later reads. Delete answers, single and bulk, now take the flag's value from the recorded answer; reads of a served-deleted entity still show it marked deleted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(environment): set aside two hunks next to lines main's saved-values change rewrites Main's #7267 changes the lines beside the blank-member docs and the empty-spelling check in explainUpdate. Setting them aside lets that merge apply cleanly; the commit after it puts them back on top of main's text. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(environment): restore the set-aside hunks on main and bump the skill to 51 Puts the blank-member docs and the empty-spelling check back beside main's slug and composed text and heldSlugRule. Main is at skill 50 with different text, so this branch's skill changes take 51. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(environment): bump the skill to 52 above #7260's 51 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(environment): put back the call-values hunks main's merge took its side for, and bump the skill to 53 The merge of main kept main's side where it overlapped this branch, so it could commit without a conflict. This restores this branch's side next to main's: made-object agreement beside the & slug spellings, sequence starts in the earlier evidence (now built by earlierOf), the combined value imports, and recording step 2 beside main's UI-first step 3. Main is at skill 50 and #7274 at 52, so this branch takes 53. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): keep sorts a list showed in place ruled out, and created answers' nested members as recorded A whole list in collection order that showed a renamed entity where a sort by the renamed field would have moved it now rules that sort out, so a later rename of the same entity cannot teach it. A create's answer leaves out members its item read added inside an object the answer showed, as the recorded answer did; the state still stores them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): keep a later create's made object only with clocks its request stamped followsMadeObjects only checked that a made object's clocks parsed, so a later create whose object showed an older clock still passed, while serving stamps the write's clock. Its clocks must now be in the rule's format and within the stamp window of that create's request. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(environment): compare soft-deleted read fields * fix(environment): reject contradictory learned sequences * fix(environment): preserve initially deleted item observations * fix(environment): index stored deleted entities separately * fix(environment): replay lists that include deleted records * fix(environment): make no count of a made-object member earlier creates held alike A count only a later create shows starts at the exemplar's value, which is right only while the exemplar is the one create accepted: creates accepted after it showed the member unchanged, which a count would have moved. The merge now refuses such a count, as the top-level sequence check does. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: morluto <76467478+morluto@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Scenarios save response fields and reuse generated IDs, typed JSON and authentication headers in later steps. Integrates Edgar Arakelyan’s #7162, with original credit preserved and upstream changes through
9f5191ab0compared.Canonical domain validation owns reference ordering. Shared browser owners handle exact numbers, bounded UTF-8/body reads, retained accounting and source privacy; CLI/MCP use the same implementation. Empty saves preserve existing Evidence identity. No dependency or release-version change in this PR.
Behavior and boundaries
This extends existing explicit request/UI operations without a new provider or execution authority. Compressed/cache-unknown saved UI bodies remain unsupported. Complete retained parent Evidence remains accessible.
Executed validation
check:fastpassed. The documented verification tree combines pinned public main/PR inputs with2c5f9cc14and upstream reconciliation0d89c6540.docs:check, rendereddocs:build, andformat:checkpassed on the final head. Evidence, limitations and reproduction.The primary pair holds runtime/provider/dependencies constant: calls 3→1 per task, input catalog + all arguments/text replies including proof exports 34,885→25,881 estimated o200k tokens. Whole verifier elapsed 13.413→8.092 s, CPU 15.347→9.387 s, sampled process-family peak 2.018→1.689 GB. First/warm timings and all earlier pairs, including slower candidate results, remain recorded. Two CPUs and an 8 GiB family guard bounded checks. No actual model billing, external PocketBase resource use, fully cold OS-cache or general speedup claim.
Review, CI and remaining scope
All fifteen actionable review threads are fixed at their owners, including source/whole-JSON privacy, ambiguous identity, credential/exemplar accounting, path normalization, event publication, expansion, screenshot privacy and preservation of page-value chronology.
Final-head CI run 40423097902 passes static/docs/build, Windows build, Linux native baseline, real-browser and agentenv. Source has 20,232 passed / 1 failed; the completed shard has 1,909 passed / 1 failed. Both failures (bundle-root inventory and empty Java bitness) independently reproduce on the exact CI main parent
8a47cbbcce538f511609b90b5d40bd00920b3216. All cancelled-shard logs were inspected and emit no additional failure; those lanes remain incomplete. Two historical SAZ assertions also reproduce on that parent but are not claimed as executed by this final CI run. The earlier own event-budget failure was fixed rather than bypassed.The latest upstream query and refused-slug corrections are integrated; their three regressions fail before the fix. All fifteen earlier actionable review threads are resolved. A further Codex review request was refused by the repository usage limit, so no fresh successful automated review is claimed. User-authorized admin bypass covers the independently proven main failures and unchecked human-readiness gate.
Real-provider scope is Linux Chromium, an owned PocketBase frontend and the shared CI fixture. Other platforms, real Basic-auth servers, service-worker integrations and historical multi-app/model evaluations were not verified here.
Author readiness
Human owner: @gensokyo-dev (account used at the user's direction; no human-review attestation made).
The user explicitly authorized a non-draft PR and admin bypass of the human-readiness gate without filling these declarations, plus bypass of independently proven unrelated main failures. This does not assert human review occurred. Actionable findings caused by this change will be fixed before merge.