Fix doc links and add tests#70
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @tastelikefeet, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on enhancing the reliability and maintainability of the project's documentation. It addresses several issues with broken or incorrectly formatted links and introduces automated testing to prevent similar problems in the future. The primary goal is to ensure that all documentation references are accurate and accessible, thereby improving the user experience and reducing future maintenance overhead. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request primarily focuses on fixing documentation links and introducing a new test suite to validate markdown links, which is a great addition for maintaining documentation quality. The changes are generally good, but I've identified a couple of areas in the updated documentation that could be clearer. I've also suggested some improvements to the new link validation script to make it more robust.
PR type
PR information
Write the detail information belongs to this PR.
Experiment results
Paste your experiment result here(if needed).