Skip to content

feat: include placeholderValue in SourceTreeElement JSON format#40

Merged
gmegidish merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/placeholder-value
May 3, 2026
Merged

feat: include placeholderValue in SourceTreeElement JSON format#40
gmegidish merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/placeholder-value

Conversation

@gmegidish
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

adds placeholderValue to the json dump format so clients can identify
text fields and secure text fields by their placeholder text.
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 2, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 947ed911-1fac-48c7-8772-c3d7bba583ac

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 88c38aa and 8bcd59c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • DeviceKitTests/XCTest/AXElement.swift

Walkthrough

A new optional placeholderValue property of type String? has been added to the SourceTreeElement Codable data model. The property is initialized from the corresponding placeholderValue attribute of the source axElement object within the init(axElement:) initializer. This change extends the SourceTreeElement schema to capture and store placeholder value information without modifying any other existing properties or initialization logic.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided by the author, making it impossible to assess relevance to the changeset. Add a pull request description explaining the purpose and context of including placeholderValue in SourceTreeElement.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding placeholderValue to SourceTreeElement's JSON format.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/placeholder-value

Review rate limit: 4/5 reviews remaining, refill in 12 minutes.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gmegidish gmegidish merged commit 711f531 into main May 3, 2026
6 checks passed
@gmegidish gmegidish deleted the feat/placeholder-value branch May 3, 2026 13:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant