Proof for mathd_algebra_513 - #55
Open
aleph-prover-test[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Automated commit at 20260220_172234
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proven lemmas: 3/3
The goal is to prove that for real numbers a, b ∈ ℝ satisfying the linear system 3a + 2b = 5 and a + b = 2, it follows that a = 1 ∧ b = 1.
The proof is decomposed into two sub-results: one lemma proves a = 1 from the two equations, and a second lemma proves b = 1 from the same assumptions.
Both sub-lemmas are already solved: each is discharged by Lean’s linear arithmetic tactic linarith, which can solve small linear systems automatically.
With these in hand, the main theorem is proved by combining the two conclusions using a conjunction constructor, yielding ⟨a = 1, b = 1⟩.
So progress is complete: 2 sub-problems solved out of 2, and the final statement is also finished.
An interesting aspect is that the whole argument can be done either “explicitly” by eliminating variables (e.g., doubling a + b = 2 and subtracting from 3a + 2b = 5) or fully automatically via linarith, and the current proof uses the automated route.