Fix #110 (stabilize field tactic)#122
Merged
proux01 merged 1 commit intomath-comp:masterfrom Sep 15, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
The |
Collaborator
Author
|
My bad, I confused that with the common abstract/no_check pattern to speed up Qed. |
Collaborator
Author
|
The CI error is probably due to some stalled Docker image, not sure there is much we can do about that. |
Collaborator
Author
|
Now that affeldt-aist/infotheo#178 is merged, let's merge (and hope it doesn't break too much reverse dependencies). |
Member
|
Apery seems broken. |
proux01
added a commit
to proux01/apery
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2025
Collaborator
Author
|
Should be fixed by rocq-community/apery#38 |
proux01
added a commit
to rocq-community/apery
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2025
This was referenced Sep 17, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix #110
This doesn't work with no_check but no_check doesn't lake much sense in this context anway, as it's essentially meant to be used wrapped in abstract, hence for goal-terminating tactics.