Skip to content

WIP: Feature/coverall integration#195

Open
Fuco1 wants to merge 21 commits intomasterfrom
feature/coverall-integration
Open

WIP: Feature/coverall integration#195
Fuco1 wants to merge 21 commits intomasterfrom
feature/coverall-integration

Conversation

@Fuco1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Fuco1 Fuco1 commented Oct 14, 2016

  • Remove emacs 23 tests
  • Run tests using the evm & cask combo (as is standard these days)
  • Run tests for all 24.* versions as well as 25.1
  • Add coveralls support

@Fuco1 Fuco1 changed the title Feature/coverall integration WIP: Feature/coverall integration Oct 14, 2016
@magnars
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

magnars commented Oct 14, 2016

Looking good!

@Fuco1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Fuco1 commented Oct 14, 2016

Can't get undercover to work, it alawys gives me

UNDERCOVER: No coverage information. Make sure that your files are not compiled?

I don't see anything that should compile dash before tests. Hmm.

@Fuco1 Fuco1 force-pushed the feature/coverall-integration branch 2 times, most recently from 1501d9c to 728d44d Compare October 14, 2016 12:58
@Fuco1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Fuco1 commented Oct 14, 2016

So the problem was with doing -l dash.el etc... it has to be loaded via require in the code. Still I can only pick up dash-functional and not dash itself. I'm getting out of ideas :/

@Wilfred
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Wilfred commented Nov 5, 2016

Might I suggest separating out the EVM changes from moving to coveralls? AFAICS the EVM + cask work is ready to merge.

@Fuco1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Fuco1 commented Nov 5, 2016

That's a good idea. I'm finishing next smartparens release now so I'll probably spend the weekend on that. Do you want to try and get this separated?

@Fuco1 Fuco1 force-pushed the feature/coverall-integration branch from b903a0f to 2e8d667 Compare October 28, 2017 16:08
@basil-conto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Is this still something we want to have?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants