Skip to content

Shorten the Stride replan example within the existing CLI budget #8325

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
loopx-agent wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+5 −5
Open

Shorten the Stride replan example within the existing CLI budget #8325

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions loopx/control_plane/work_items/stride_policy.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -371,11 +371,11 @@ export function strideControlContract(context: JsonObject, obligationId: unknown
const example: JsonObject = {schema_version: decisionSchema.schema_version, strategy_version: context.stride_strategy,
reference_context_id: context.context_id ?? null, reference_obligation_id: obligationId,
basis: "uncertain_evidence", action: "verify", axes: {
work_slice: {plan: "Complete the work and checks needed to resolve the pending adoption decision.", reason: "Resolve decision-relevant uncertainty before expanding the route."},
route_distance: {plan: "Keep the current method; vary the unresolved assumption only.", reason: "The existing evidence does not yet distinguish a replacement route."},
validation_scope: {plan: "Check the disputed outcome and its relevant failure case under the same constraints.", reason: "Obtain independent evidence rather than repeat an unchanged check."}},
next_probe: {scope: "One complete decision-relevant verification.", prediction: "Distinguish the remaining explanations.",
adoption_criterion: "Applicable evidence supports the next slice.", cost_bound: "Bound full implementation and validation cost.", minimum_evidence: "A verified outcome, relevant failure evidence and attributable cost."}};
work_slice: {plan: "Complete the work and checks for the adoption decision.", reason: "Resolve adoption uncertainty before expanding."},
route_distance: {plan: "Vary only the unresolved assumption in the current method.", reason: "Evidence leaves the replacement route uncertain."},
validation_scope: {plan: "Verify the disputed outcome and failure case under the same constraints.", reason: "Obtain new independent evidence."}},
next_probe: {scope: "One complete decision-relevant check.", prediction: "Distinguish the remaining explanations.",
adoption_criterion: "Applicable evidence supports the next slice.", cost_bound: "Bound all implementation and validation costs.", minimum_evidence: "Verified outcome, relevant failure evidence and attributable cost."}};
if (previous) example.previous_review = {reference_decision_ref: previous, adoption: "unknown", information_gain: "unknown", goal_gain: "unknown",
evidence_refs: [], lesson: "Example only: inspect subsequent work and evidence before replacing these unknowns."};
if (basis) example.explore_review = {revision: basis.revision, disposition: basis.availability === "unavailable" ? "unavailable" : "deferred",
Expand Down
Loading