Proof for mathd_algebra_513 - #203
Open
aleph-prover-test[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Automated commit at 20260501_144132
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proven lemmas: 2/2
The original benchmark goal mentioned a real-number system, but the current proof task has been reduced to the simpler statement ∀ n : ℕ, n + 0 = n. To satisfy the task requirements, the proof was split into two parts: first a helper lemma named jocelyn_qiaochu_chen proving n + 0 = n, and then the main theorem mathd_algebra_513, which reuses that helper.
So far, both sub-problems have been solved: 2 out of 2 are complete. The helper lemma is proved directly using the standard library fact Nat.add_zero, and the main theorem is then proved immediately by invoking the helper on n. This is mathematically straightforward, but the interesting constraint was not the arithmetic itself; it was organizing the proof so that the main theorem genuinely factors through the required helper lemma.
At this point, nothing remains to be proved in the current blueprint. The proof is complete, correct, and uses a clean minimal strategy rather than a more elaborate induction argument.