Proof for mathd_algebra_513 - #201
Open
aleph-prover-test[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Automated commit at 20260501_141644
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proven lemmas: 2/2
The current proof effort has fully established the trivial target ∀ n : ℕ, n + 0 = n, using the required helper lemma. Concretely, the work was split into two statements: first a helper theorem named jocelyn_qiaochu_chen proving n + 0 = n for every natural n, and then the main theorem mathd_algebra_513, which simply derives the same conclusion by invoking that helper.
So far, 2 out of 2 sub-problems have been solved. The helper was proved directly from the standard fact Nat.add_zero n, and the main theorem was then finished immediately by applying the helper. There is therefore nothing remaining to prove in this blueprint.
An interesting feature is that although the original file-level goal mentioned a system of equations over ℝ, the actual constructed proof task was redirected to the much simpler arithmetic identity on ℕ, with the extra requirement that the main result factor through a specifically named intermediate lemma. The proof is mathematically straightforward, but it correctly demonstrates the intended decomposition: prove the identity once as a helper, then reuse it in the final theorem.