Proof for mathd_algebra_513 - #188
Open
aleph-prover-test[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Automated commit at 20260306_160620
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proven lemmas: 1/1
The current theorem proves that if real numbers a, b ∈ ℝ satisfy the system 3a + 2b = 5 and a + b = 2, then necessarily a = 1 and b = 1. The proof naturally decomposes into two sub-goals: show a = 1 and show b = 1, since the target is a conjunction a = 1 ∧ b = 1.
Progress is complete: 2 out of 2 sub-problems are solved. The main strategy is straightforward linear algebra/arithmetic: from a + b = 2, rewrite b = 2 - a, substitute into 3a + 2b = 5, and solve to get a = 1; then plug back in to get b = 1. In Lean, this is handled very efficiently by linarith, which can solve both linear equalities directly from the hypotheses.
So there is nothing remaining to prove for this node. An interesting aspect is that although the informal solution is just substitution, the formal proof can be compressed into a one-line linear-arithmetic argument, reflecting that the system has a unique solution.