Proof for mathd_algebra_513 - #186
Open
aleph-prover-test[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Automated commit at 20260305_224346
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proven lemmas: 1/1
The goal is to prove that for real numbers a, b ∈ ℝ satisfying the two linear equations 3·a + 2·b = 5 and a + b = 2, it follows that a = 1 and b = 1 (i.e., a = 1 ∧ b = 1).
The proof is decomposed into two sub-goals because the conclusion is a conjunction: first show a = 1, then show b = 1.
So far, both sub-goals have been solved: Lean uses
constructorto split the goal into the two parts, and then applieslinarith [h₀, h₁]to each part to derive the required equalities from the given linear system.That means progress is complete: 2 out of 2 sub-problems are finished, and there is nothing remaining to prove.
An interesting aspect is that
linarithcan solve each variable directly from the pair of equations without manual substitution; alternatively, one could solve by substituting b = 2 − a from a + b = 2 into the first equation and back-substituting, butlinarithautomates this linear-algebra step.(Also noted: your test comment was included in the informal proof text, indicating the message was received.)