Proof for mathd_algebra_513 - #185
Open
aleph-prover-test[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Automated commit at 20260305_224335
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proven lemmas: 1/1
The goal is to prove that if a, b ∈ ℝ satisfy the linear system 3·a + 2·b = 5 and a + b = 2, then necessarily a = 1 and b = 1.
The proof is decomposed into two sub-goals because the conclusion is a conjunction: first show a = 1, then show b = 1, and finally combine them into a = 1 ∧ b = 1.
Both sub-goals are solved: Lean uses the tactic linarith with the two given equations to derive a = 1, and then linarith again to derive b = 1.
So progress is complete: 2 out of 2 sub-problems have been proved, and nothing remains.
An interesting aspect is that this avoids manual algebra (substitution/elimination) by letting linarith automatically solve the linear constraints; an alternative strategy would be to rewrite b = 2 − a from a + b = 2, substitute into 3·a + 2·b = 5, and then solve, but linarith handles all of this directly.