Skip to content

Fix memory expiration logic due to timestamp format mismatch#5

Draft
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-expiration-logic-timezone-mismatch-11815751352958429024
Draft

Fix memory expiration logic due to timestamp format mismatch#5
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-expiration-logic-timezone-mismatch-11815751352958429024

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes a bug where memory expiration logic was incorrect because of string format mismatches between Go's time serialization (RFC3339) and SQLite's datetime('now') output.

The fix involves wrapping the expires_at column in datetime() in all SQL queries to ensure both sides of the comparison are in the same format.
Verified with a reproduction test case that confirmed the issue and the fix.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 11815751352958429024 started by @fakebizprez

The `expires_at` column is stored as an RFC3339 string (with 'T' separator and timezone info) by the Go driver. SQLite's `datetime('now')` returns a string with space separator and no timezone offset (UTC).
Lexicographical comparison between these two formats was incorrect, causing expiring memories to persist indefinitely or expire prematurely depending on the context.

This commit wraps `expires_at` in SQLite's `datetime()` function in all queries to normalize the format before comparison, ensuring correct expiration logic.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants