Conversation
|
Needed to upgrade MSRV to |
|
Ok, |
|
I appreciate you keeping this up to date. MSRV always seems a heated topic. Clearly most active people here want to ditch the approach of tracking some Linux distribution for its Rust version. I'm fine with that also because Rust seems to patch security vulnerabilities in latest versions, and not back port them to earlier ones (i.e. no LTS releases or anything like that). So, if you could resolve the conflict then we can merge. |
Signed-off-by: Christian König <ckoenig@posteo.de>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <ckoenig@posteo.de>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <ckoenig@posteo.de>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <ckoenig@posteo.de>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <ckoenig@posteo.de>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <ckoenig@posteo.de>
59d5396 to
dd28667
Compare
I appreciate Yeah, MSRV is a heated topic. My opinion: they have a clean installer/uninstaller which easily allows to update (or remove) Merge conflicts have been resolved. |
|
Sorry for taking so long. Merging now! If I may... there are a couple of security alerts one of which requiring webkpi >= 0.22. Would you be so kind? |
|
I created a PR (#1224) to update all dependencies to their latest version. However, |
|
There is a PR that would update |
|
That's a pity. If the repo is stale, with no other active fork, maybe we should bundle a patched version? This is the vulnerability. I think it's OK to post, since it is not easily exploitable and does not grant privilege escalation:
|
|
There are some "active" forks (https://techgaun.github.io/active-forks/index.html#https://github.com/tafia/hyper-proxy) but mainly they contain one additional branch with updated dependencies.
This could be a way to go - but is outside of my rust knowledge/scope. |
|
One of the forks is from @herrernst who already contributed to |
|
Yeah, I experimented a little bit with the hyper* dependencies. hyper was just released as 1.0.0: https://github.com/hyperium/hyper/releases/tag/v1.0.0 |
Update dependencies
Updates dependencies