Promote babysit skill rewrite - #153
Conversation
Work intentphase: completed
summary: "Promoted the approved babysit rewrite and verified PR #153 through merge."
touch-points:
- ".agents/skills/babysit/SKILL.md"
- ".agents/skills/babysit/references/merge.md"
- "test/agent-guidance.test.ts"
blocked-by: []
may-block: []
decisions:
- "Canonical skill files remain byte-for-byte identical to the approved rewrite sources."
- "The structural test follows the explicit merge-reference disclosure."
- "Review findings were declined within the approved boundary with replies and resolved threads."
validation:
- "skill-creator quick_validate.py: valid"
- "npm run ci:local: passed (712/712)"
- "GitHub CI Verify (Node 24): passed at 72b9a58bb0"
- "Current-head Codex review: two findings dispositioned and resolved"
- "Markover done: zero matching local reviews"
mergeCommit: "a46ab164992e819d0309b844736479c38ba2eae7"
branch: "agent/promote-babysit-skill"
thread: "start-issue-promote-babysit-20260813-c7f3a9e2" |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e88dca7f35
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 72b9a58bb0
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
1 participant
What changed
.agents/skills/babysit/SKILL.md.agents/skills/babysit/references/merge.mdtest/agent-guidance.test.tsso the structural assertion follows the skill’s explicit merge-reference disclosureWhy
This is the bounded follow-up to merged PR #152. The approved progressive-disclosure rewrite keeps the machine-readable-help /
pullRequestStatuscontract inreferences/merge.md; the existing test incorrectly required that wording inline inSKILL.md. The test now verifies both the disclosure pointer and the disclosed contract.Impact
Agent workflow guidance and its structural test only; no application behavior or unrelated process files.
Checks
python3 /Users/lasto/.codex/skills/.system/skill-creator/scripts/quick_validate.py .agents/skills/babysitgit diff --checknpm run ci:localFollow-up to #152.