Skip to content

Add BIQ shells for new principles - #78

Merged
tig merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
cascade/principles
Oct 14, 2026
Merged

tig merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
cascade/principles

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Company and principle shells from kindel/principles.

New companies land with examples: false and empty question lists.
Existing banks are not rewritten. This does not generate example packs
and does not spend xAI credits.

Next, if a new company or principle showed up: write the questions,
run Generate example packs, review, then set examples: true.

See .kindel/last-sync.txt.

@tig
tig marked this pull request as draft October 14, 2026 19:04

tig commented Oct 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-14T20:25:47.971925Z d74d308 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍

Reviewed commit: 483bf58d66

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@tig
tig marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2026 19:22
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 14, 2026 19:22
@tig tig self-assigned this Oct 14, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The narrowly scoped preamble, test, and sync-record changes are consistent, with no blocking issues identified.

0 open findings

What changed in this PR

Syncs the existing USMC preamble from kindel/principles; no new shells or question banks are added.

Changes:

  • Removes the traits URL while retaining the further-reading explanation.
  • Updates the framing test and upstream sync record.
File Description
tests/​test_framing.py Checks the mnemonic and further-reading wording instead of the URL.
data/​questions.json Removes the traits URL from the USMC preamble.
.kindel/​last-sync.txt Records the upstream revision and preamble update.

🧠 Review effort: Balanced


💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 483bf58d66

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread data/questions.json Outdated
@tig
tig marked this pull request as draft October 14, 2026 19:34
@tig tig removed their assignment Oct 14, 2026
BIQ copies the blog list from data/teaching/<company>/index.json onto the company shell and renders those links for the selected company. The USMC view links Leadership Traits to the official traits page, and the sync keeps the list on the next cascade.
@tig

tig commented Oct 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@codex review

@tig
tig requested a balanced review from Copilot October 14, 2026 19:53

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 59968a4938

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread tests/test_framing.py

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Changes recommended

The new reading label fails the minimum text contrast requirement in the default theme.

1 open finding

🧠 Review effort: Balanced

Comment thread css/biq.css Outdated
The framing check validates Further reading only when a shell has a blog list, so a new company from the principles index does not fail CI before its teaching file exists. The Further reading label uses the dark accent so the small caps clear 4.5:1 on the paper background.
@tig
tig requested a balanced review from Copilot October 14, 2026 20:02
@tig

tig commented Oct 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one!

Reviewed commit: d74d308c29

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The synchronization, rendering, data, and regression checks have no identified unresolved blocking issues.

0 open findings

1 resolved since last review

🧠 Review effort: Balanced

@tig
tig marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2026 20:23
@tig tig self-assigned this Oct 14, 2026
@tig
tig merged commit 8b29b43 into main Oct 14, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants