Bump i18next from 26.3.3 to 26.3.4

[dependabot]

Bumps i18next from 26.3.3 to 26.3.4.

Release notes

Sourced from i18next's releases.

v26.3.4

• fix(security): deepExtend (used by addResourceBundle(..., deep, overwrite)) no longer recurses into inherited properties. It checked key existence with the in operator, which walks the prototype chain, so a source key matching an inherited built-in (e.g. hasOwnProperty, toString) caused recursion into the shared Object.prototype function and, with overwrite: true, could overwrite e.g. Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call with a non-callable value — corrupting a shared built-in process-wide (DoS). Existence is now checked with Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call, so such keys are copied as plain own data instead. This complements the existing __proto__/constructor guard and is also strictly more correct for an own-property merge. Only affects applications that pass attacker-controlled data with deep: true and overwrite: true; no standard backend/integration does this. Distinct from CVE-2026-48713 / CVE-2026-48714 (different packages, setPath mechanism). Thanks to zx (Jace) for the responsible disclosure.

Changelog

Sourced from i18next's changelog.

26.3.4

• fix(security): deepExtend (used by addResourceBundle(..., deep, overwrite)) no longer recurses into inherited properties. It checked key existence with the in operator, which walks the prototype chain, so a source key matching an inherited built-in (e.g. hasOwnProperty, toString) caused recursion into the shared Object.prototype function and, with overwrite: true, could overwrite e.g. Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call with a non-callable value — corrupting a shared built-in process-wide (DoS). Existence is now checked with Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call, so such keys are copied as plain own data instead. This complements the existing __proto__/constructor guard and is also strictly more correct for an own-property merge. Only affects applications that pass attacker-controlled data with deep: true and overwrite: true; no standard backend/integration does this. Distinct from CVE-2026-48713 / CVE-2026-48714 (different packages, setPath mechanism). See advisory GHSA-6jcc-5g8w-32mx, CVSS 5.9 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H). Thanks to zx (Jace) @​manus-use for the responsible disclosure.

Commits

• 817ede5 26.3.4
• 46d0dd8 build
• 642137b fix(security): prevent deepExtend from recursing into inherited built-ins
• See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!