Repository navigation
Document the type parameter of Tuple.map - #1244
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Owner
|
Thanks for noticing and fixing! I'll merge this as soon as the build goes green |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem does this pull request solve?
Tuple.mapdeclares<U>but does not document it. Add the missing@param <U>tag.This was exposed by checkstyle/checkstyle#21836, which starts validating Javadoc on record methods. Running that Checkstyle build with EqualsVerifier's configuration reports one violation before this change and none afterward. Spotless passes.
Prepared with Codex in T3 Code.