Skip to content

docs(todo): mark the -s ours alignment merge as folded into release-cut#1092

Merged
joeharris76 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
docs/todo-alignment-merge-stale-text
Jul 10, 2026
Merged

docs(todo): mark the -s ours alignment merge as folded into release-cut#1092
joeharris76 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
docs/todo-alignment-merge-stale-text

Conversation

@joeharris76

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

PR #1089 folded the git merge -s ours --allow-unrelated-histories origin/main history-alignment step into the release-cut Makefile target.
Three passages across two TODO items still told the reader it was a manual
step.

The most consequential was in the Phase 8 item under planning/, which is
forward-looking guidance: it instructed a future release cutter to perform
the merge by hand. That is now wrong and would have produced a redundant
second merge.

The two passages in release-recovery-v0-3-1 are historical records of the
v0.3.1 cut, so they keep the past tense ("release-cut did not do this at the
time") and gain a pointer to #1089 rather than being rewritten as if the
target always had the merge.

Incidentally makes the pre-existing "(both fixed, see w7)" line in
release-recovery-v0-3-1 true: at the time it was written only one of the two
gaps was actually fixed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 noreply@anthropic.com

PR #1089 folded the `git merge -s ours --allow-unrelated-histories
origin/main` history-alignment step into the `release-cut` Makefile target.
Three passages across two TODO items still told the reader it was a manual
step.

The most consequential was in the Phase 8 item under planning/, which is
forward-looking guidance: it instructed a future release cutter to perform
the merge by hand. That is now wrong and would have produced a redundant
second merge.

The two passages in release-recovery-v0-3-1 are historical records of the
v0.3.1 cut, so they keep the past tense ("release-cut did not do this at the
time") and gain a pointer to #1089 rather than being rewritten as if the
target always had the merge.

Incidentally makes the pre-existing "(both fixed, see w7)" line in
release-recovery-v0-3-1 true: at the time it was written only one of the two
gaps was actually fixed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@joeharris76 joeharris76 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 10, 2026 12:19
@joeharris76 joeharris76 merged commit e6cfb20 into develop Jul 10, 2026
16 checks passed
@joeharris76 joeharris76 deleted the docs/todo-alignment-merge-stale-text branch July 10, 2026 12:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant