Skip to content

HANDOFF: restamp at main tip 09b0765 (merge of #89) - #92

Open
jcdavis131 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/handoff-fresh-a7cf
Open

jcdavis131 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/handoff-fresh-a7cf

Conversation

@jcdavis131

@jcdavis131 jcdavis131 commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Refresh the trusted-first block in HANDOFF.md so scripts/check_handoff_fresh.py --check stays inside the 20-commit budget, including on GitHub's pull_request merge ref.

What changed

Only HANDOFF.md. The live block now records HEAD 09b0765 (origin/main, merge of #89) and summarises the 9 commits in git log 43f4189..origin/main:

Open PRs #86, #87, #90, and #91 are listed as drafts pending review. No merge claims. Suite counts from the 2026-10-13 block were not re-measured.

Why this sha

check_handoff_fresh.py takes the first HEAD \`and countsgit rev-list recorded..HEAD. CI runs that against actions/checkouton apull_request` event, so HEAD is the merge commit, not the branch tip.

Recording main's tip (09b0765), not this restamp commit:

Other open PRs will not go green from this merge alone

The 34-commit stale figure is #91's current merge ref vs recorded 43f4189. Merging this PR without new commits on those branches:

Test plan

  • scripts/check_handoff_fresh.py --check on the branch (drift 1, OK)
  • Simulated merge-ref check (drift 2, OK)
  • lint-and-test on this draft: records 09b0765, HEAD c9b7fea, drift 2, OK
Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Record the live main ancestor, not a branch-local sha, and summarise
the nine commits since 43f4189. Open PRs #86, #87, #90 and #91 stay
drafts pending review.

Co-authored-by: Cam Davis <jcdavis131@gmail.com>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
arxiviq Ready Ready Preview Oct 23, 2026 1:49pm UTC
dottie-os-console Ready Ready Preview Oct 23, 2026 1:49pm UTC

Request Review

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved. Cursor Bugbot was not present after the first check poll, so that signal was skipped; remaining CI checks completed successfully and there are no review findings that need human attention. No reviewers were assigned.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Router and Approver

This branch was successfully deployed

2 active deployments
Preview – dottie-os-console — 209f88f7 Deployed Oct 23, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – arxiviq — 209f88f7 Deployed Oct 23, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants