Skip to content

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix information disclosure and timing attack vulnerabilities#213

Open
ivanleekk wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
sentinel-fix-internal-security-7876005265443950948
Open

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix information disclosure and timing attack vulnerabilities#213
ivanleekk wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
sentinel-fix-internal-security-7876005265443950948

Conversation

@ivanleekk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🚨 Severity: HIGH
πŸ’‘ Vulnerability: The internal /tasks/daily-snapshot endpoint suffered from two security issues:

  1. It used a basic string comparison (!=) to check the X-Scheduler-Secret header, which is vulnerable to timing attacks.
  2. The global exception handler blindly returned raw exception strings (str(e)) in 500 HTTP responses, risking information disclosure of internal system states.
    🎯 Impact: An attacker could potentially bruteforce the scheduler secret using timing analysis. Furthermore, unexpected errors could leak database structures, stack traces, or other sensitive runtime information directly to clients.
    πŸ”§ Fix:
  • Replaced the string comparison with secrets.compare_digest() for constant-time secret validation (also ensuring we handle None values securely).
  • Updated the exception handler to use logger.error("...", exc_info=True) to safely record the error internally, while returning a generic, non-descriptive error message to the client.
    βœ… Verification:
  • Confirmed logic locally via code review.
  • Ran backend pytest suite ensuring changes did not disrupt expected endpoint functionality.
  • Ran ruff check to ensure syntax and formatting compliance.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 7876005265443950948 started by @ivanleekk

Co-authored-by: ivanleekk <84584280+ivanleekk@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant