Skip to content

itdove/devaiflow#351: Fix confusing instructions in ticket creation session prompts#354

Merged
itdove merged 1 commit intomainfrom
351
Mar 31, 2026
Merged

itdove/devaiflow#351: Fix confusing instructions in ticket creation session prompts#354
itdove merged 1 commit intomainfrom
351

Conversation

@itdove
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@itdove itdove commented Mar 31, 2026

Description

This PR refactors the issue creation prompts in the DevAIFlow CLI to clarify backend type instructions. The changes improve user experience by making the prompts in git new and jira new commands less confusing when creating tickets.

The refactoring focuses on clarifying the backend type selection process during ticket creation sessions, making it more intuitive for users to understand which backend they're working with.

Assisted-by: Claude

Testing

Steps to test

  1. Pull down the PR
  2. Run devflow git new command and verify the prompts clearly indicate the backend type
  3. Run devflow jira new command and verify the prompts clearly indicate the backend type
  4. Verify that the instructions during the ticket creation flow are clear and unambiguous
  5. Create a test issue using both commands to ensure functionality remains intact

Scenarios tested

  • Verified prompt clarity when creating new Git issues
  • Verified prompt clarity when creating new JIRA issues
  • Confirmed no functional regression in the issue creation workflow

Deployment considerations

  • This code change is ready for deployment on its own

- Remove "detailed" qualifier from issue creation instructions
- Add explicit backend type indicators to prompts
- Simplify command reference phrasing

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@itdove itdove marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2026 18:02
@itdove itdove merged commit 50ab6d4 into main Mar 31, 2026
7 checks passed
@itdove itdove deleted the 351 branch March 31, 2026 18:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant