Skip to content

Conversation

@notaphplover
Copy link
Member

Description

This PR adds missing esm type declaration files.

Motivation and Context

This PR solves an issue for node16+ users targeting inversify as an esm module.

How Has This Been Tested?

https://arethetypeswrong.github.io/ passes with the tar generated.

Types of changes

  • Updated docs / Refactor code / Added a tests case (non-breaking change)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • I have updated the changelog.

@notaphplover notaphplover self-assigned this Nov 12, 2024
@notaphplover notaphplover merged commit 00cb0ba into master Nov 12, 2024
8 checks passed
@notaphplover notaphplover deleted the fix/add-missing-typescript-esm-types branch November 12, 2024 11:55
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.53%. Comparing base (5b7c8c8) to head (8322b46).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1623   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.53%   99.53%           
=======================================
  Files          50       50           
  Lines        1492     1492           
  Branches      189      189           
=======================================
  Hits         1485     1485           
  Misses          4        4           
  Partials        3        3           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants