Skip to content

Conversation

@paperbenni
Copy link
Member

@paperbenni paperbenni commented Jan 29, 2026

⚡ Bolt: Use stack allocation for status text in drawstatusbar

💡 What: Replaced malloc/free with a stack buffer (char buf[1024]) in drawstatusbar.
🎯 Why: drawstatusbar is called frequently during bar updates. Allocating memory on the heap for a temporary string copy is unnecessary overhead, especially since the source stext is a fixed 1024-byte global buffer.
📊 Impact: Eliminates heap allocation/deallocation in the hot path of bar rendering. Reduces memory fragmentation and improves cache locality.
🔬 Measurement: Verified that the build passes and the logic correctly handles the common case (stack) and the edge case (heap fallback).


PR created automatically by Jules for task 3051428190191952778 started by @paperbenni

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

  • Replace dynamic allocation in drawstatusbar with a stack-allocated buffer and fall back to heap allocation only when the text exceeds the stack buffer size.

Replaces dynamic allocation with a fixed-size stack buffer (1024 bytes) for
status text processing. This eliminates malloc/free calls in the frequent
rendering path (drawbar). A fallback to malloc is included for safety if
the status text exceeds the buffer size.

- Adds `char buf[1024]` stack buffer.
- Adds logic to use stack buffer by default.
- Adds `use_malloc` flag to handle cleanup correctly.
- Adds comment explaining the optimization.

Verification:
- Build passes with `make clean && make`.
- Logic handles both stack and heap paths correctly.

Co-authored-by: paperbenni <15818888+paperbenni@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Refactors drawstatusbar to use a fixed-size stack buffer for the status text with a guarded heap fallback, eliminating unconditional heap allocation/free in the hot rendering path.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Optimize drawstatusbar status text handling to prefer stack allocation and only fall back to heap allocation when needed.
  • Introduce a fixed-size stack buffer for the status text and compute whether the input length fits within it.
  • Allocate status text on the heap only when it exceeds the stack buffer size, tracking this with a flag.
  • Copy the status text into the chosen buffer and ensure that free() is only called when heap allocation was used.
bar.c

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've found 1 issue, and left some high level feedback:

  • The hardcoded char buf[1024] duplicates the implicit contract of stext’s max size; consider tying this to a shared constant or sizeof the underlying global buffer to avoid silent divergence if the status text size ever changes.
  • Since len comes from strlen and is used in a size context, using size_t for len (and optionally a bool for use_malloc) would better reflect intent and avoid potential signed/unsigned issues in future changes.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- The hardcoded `char buf[1024]` duplicates the implicit contract of `stext`’s max size; consider tying this to a shared constant or `sizeof` the underlying global buffer to avoid silent divergence if the status text size ever changes.
- Since `len` comes from `strlen` and is used in a size context, using `size_t` for `len` (and optionally a `bool` for `use_malloc`) would better reflect intent and avoid potential signed/unsigned issues in future changes.

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location> `bar.c:59-60` </location>
<code_context>
     char *text;
     char *p;
+    /* Optimization: Use stack buffer for status text to avoid malloc overhead */
+    char buf[1024];
+    int use_malloc = 0;

     len = strlen(stext) + 1;
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
**suggestion (bug_risk):** Consider aligning types and limits when comparing `len` to `sizeof(buf)`.

Here `sizeof(buf)` is `size_t` while `len` is an `int`, which can trigger signed/unsigned comparison warnings and obscure overflow/limit issues. Please make `len` a `size_t` (matching `strlen` and `sizeof(buf)`), and then you can simply use `malloc(len)` instead of `sizeof(char) * len`.

Suggested implementation:

```c
    short isCode = 0;
    char *text;
    char *p;
    /* Optimization: Use stack buffer for status text to avoid malloc overhead */
    char buf[1024];
    int use_malloc = 0;
    size_t len;

    len = strlen(stext) + 1;
    if (len > sizeof(buf)) {
        if (!(text = (char *)malloc(len))) {
            die("malloc");
        }
        use_malloc = 1;
    } else {
        text = buf;
    }

```

If `len` is declared elsewhere in this function or file (e.g., as `int len;`), that declaration should be updated to `size_t len;` and the duplicate declaration here removed to avoid redefinition errors.
</issue_to_address>

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Comment on lines +59 to +60
char buf[1024];
int use_malloc = 0;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (bug_risk): Consider aligning types and limits when comparing len to sizeof(buf).

Here sizeof(buf) is size_t while len is an int, which can trigger signed/unsigned comparison warnings and obscure overflow/limit issues. Please make len a size_t (matching strlen and sizeof(buf)), and then you can simply use malloc(len) instead of sizeof(char) * len.

Suggested implementation:

    short isCode = 0;
    char *text;
    char *p;
    /* Optimization: Use stack buffer for status text to avoid malloc overhead */
    char buf[1024];
    int use_malloc = 0;
    size_t len;

    len = strlen(stext) + 1;
    if (len > sizeof(buf)) {
        if (!(text = (char *)malloc(len))) {
            die("malloc");
        }
        use_malloc = 1;
    } else {
        text = buf;
    }

If len is declared elsewhere in this function or file (e.g., as int len;), that declaration should be updated to size_t len; and the duplicate declaration here removed to avoid redefinition errors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant