If you believe you've found a security vulnerability in kube-coder, please do not file a public GitHub issue. Instead, email a description of the issue to:

security@imranresearch.dev (or open a private security advisory at https://github.com/imran31415/kube-coder/security/advisories/new)

We aim to acknowledge receipt within 72 hours and follow up with a fix or disposition within two weeks for routine issues. For severe issues that expose user data or allow tenant escape we will move faster.

Please include:

• A description of the issue and its impact (what an attacker can do).
• Reproduction steps or proof-of-concept against a fresh make new-user deploy.
• Affected commit / chart version.
• Any suggested mitigation.

kube-coder ships infrastructure that provisions per-user Kubernetes workspaces. The security boundaries we care about:

• Authentication — the OAuth2 / basic-auth gates on the dashboard, the Bearer-token auth on the Claude task API, and the public-readonly demo mode (ingress.auth.type=none + readOnly: true).
• Multi-tenant isolation — one workspace pod must not be able to read, modify, or impersonate another tenant's data. The shared coder namespace + per-workspace ServiceAccount model is the current trust boundary; per-workspace namespaces are the long-term hardening target.
• Code execution & SSRF surfaces — the Claude task API spawns shell sessions; the completion-hook posts arbitrary URLs; the file upload accepts binary bodies. All three are explicit attack surfaces.
• Secret exposure — the operator's GitHub App private key, OAuth2 client secret, registry pull secret, and SSH authorized_keys all live in Kubernetes Secrets accessible from the workspace.

Out of scope:

• Self-DoS via the user filling their own PVC, fork-bombing their own shell, or exhausting their own resource quota.
• Issues that require an attacker to already have a shell on the workspace pod and a different tenant's namespace+secret name. Per- workspace namespaces are the planned fix; in the meantime cross- tenant reads via known names are a documented limitation.

The repo ships secure defaults; deployments that flip these on take responsibility for the corresponding risk:

See charts/workspace/values.yaml for full annotations.