Repository navigation
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Refs #1. Adds an offline mainnet escrow receipt and checks the three movements described in the issue: 2 USDC into the adapter, then 0.02 to the fee recipient and 1.98 to the worker. The test also checks that the adapter nets to zero and that gross transfer flow is not worker earnings.
The full JSON-RPC response was retrieved separately through BlockVectra on November 7; it is not Sofiia's earlier saved copy. The README records its source, timestamp and SHA-256. Running the test needs no network or key. No production code or dependencies change.
Validated locally on Node 24.21.0: all 107 offline tests pass (including the new case), and the existing Arc lint and git diff checks pass. This covers one saved receipt and the scanner's pairing logic, not archive availability or finality.