Skip to content

IBX-12594: Required ibexa/jms-translation-bundle ^3.0 - #148

Open
ViniTou wants to merge 1 commit into
6.0from
ibx-12594-jms-translation-bundle-3
Open

ViniTou wants to merge 1 commit into
6.0from
ibx-12594-jms-translation-bundle-3

Conversation

@ViniTou

@ViniTou ViniTou commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why

ibexa/jms-translation-bundle 3.0.0 is the Symfony 8 compatible major. Symfony 8.0 removed the XML DI configuration format the bundle relied on, so the 2.x line cannot boot on Symfony 8 at all — this is a prerequisite for the wider Symfony 8 upgrade (IBX-12046).

3.0.0 drops the replace: {"jms/translation-bundle": "^2.6"} entry. This repo required jms/translation-bundle ^2.4 and was being satisfied by the fork purely through that replace. With it gone, keeping the old name would silently resolve to the upstream jms/translation-bundle package instead of the Ibexa fork — two copies of the same classes in the dependency graph. So the requirement is switched to the fork's own name.

The entry is moved into its correct alphabetical position among the other ibexa/* packages, since this repo has config.sort-packages enabled.

Merge order

Blocked until ibexa/jms-translation-bundle 3.0.0 is tagged. Until then ^3.0 will not resolve and CI here will fail on dependency resolution — that is expected, not a defect in this PR.

Bundle PR: ibexa/jms-translation-bundle#10

Risk

No code changes are needed. The bundle's container shape is unchanged across 2.x → 3.0 — service ids, aliases, tags and visibility flags were verified byte-for-byte identical — and the parent:/tag/decorates extension points used by Ibexa packages resolve identically before and after.

The fork no longer declares `replace` for `jms/translation-bundle`,
so the package has to be required under its own name.
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants