Skip to content

fix(ci): repoint codeql-action at a SHA that exists - #51

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
fix/codeql-action-sha
Jul 28, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): repoint codeql-action at a SHA that exists#51
hyperpolymath merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
fix/codeql-action-sha

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

@hyperpolymath hyperpolymath commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

github/codeql-action@29b1f65c1f735799893313399435a59f54045865 is pinned here but exists in no repository — the GitHub API returns 422 for it.

CodeQL therefore could not start: the run graph fails to build and the job reports startup_failure, so this repository has had no CodeQL scanning at all.

Repointed at 4187e74d05793876e9989daffde9c3e66b4acd07, which is what the v3 tag currently resolves to (v3.37.3), verified against the API.

Found while auditing the estate: the same non-existent SHA was pinned in 104 repositories, so CodeQL was dead across nearly all of them.


Summary by Gitar

  • CI updates:
    • Updated guix.scm package definition and metadata for squisher-corpus
    • Added actions: read permission across workflow files alongside CodeQL SHA repointing

This will update automatically on new commits.

hyperpolymath and others added 4 commits July 26, 2026 14:45
github/codeql-action@29b1f65 is pinned here but exists in no
repository -- the GitHub API returns 422 for it. CodeQL therefore could
not start: the run graph fails to build and the job reports
startup_failure, so this repository has had no CodeQL scanning at all.

Repointed at 4187e74d05793876e9989daffde9c3e66b4acd07, which is what the v3
tag currently resolves to (v3.37.3), verified against the API.

Found while auditing the estate: the same non-existent SHA is pinned in
over 100 repositories, so CodeQL is dead across nearly all of them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan D.A. Jewell <6759885+hyperpolymath@users.noreply.github.com>
Comment thread guix.scm
Comment thread guix.scm
@gitar-bot

gitar-bot Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note

Automatic reviews are paused because your trial's included automatic processing has been used for this period. Upgrade now, or comment "Gitar review" to run a review anytime.
Learn more

CI failed: CI governance gate failure due to banned ReScript source files detected in the repository.

Overview

1 log analyzed across 1 job. The CI build failed because governance checks detected tracked ReScript (.res) source files, which are banned in favor of AffineScript.

Failures

Banned Language Files Detected (confidence: high)

  • Type: tooling
  • Affected jobs: 90323705350
  • Related to change: yes
  • Root cause: The cicd_rules/banned_language_file check found tracked ReScript files (such as test/Community_test.res) violating repository language standards.
  • Suggested fix: Remove or migrate the banned ReScript files to AffineScript, or add an exemption via .hypatia-ignore / an inline pragma if intentional.

Summary

  • Change-related failures: 1 governance check failure due to banned ReScript source files.
  • Infrastructure/flaky failures: 0
  • Recommended action: Remove or migrate the banned ReScript files or declare the appropriate exemption in .hypatia-ignore.
Code Review ✅ Approved 2 resolved / 2 findings

Updates CodeQL action references to a valid SHA and adds workflow permissions, but the guix.scm update incorrectly transforms the package definition into squisher-corpus with a contradictory license header.

✅ 2 resolved
Bug: guix.scm repointed to wrong package (squisher-corpus) in grim-repo

📄 guix.scm:2 📄 guix.scm:10 📄 guix.scm:14-17
This file is grim-repo's package definition, but the diff renames the package, synopsis, description, and home-page to squisher-corpus (home-page now https://github.com/hyperpolymath/squisher-corpus). This appears to be a copy-paste from another repo (commit chore: update guix.scm from squisher-corpus) and makes guix shell -f guix.scm build a package that misidentifies the repository. Restore the grim-repo name, synopsis, description, and home-page URL.

Quality: License field contradicts SPDX header in guix.scm

📄 guix.scm:1 📄 guix.scm:17
The SPDX header on line 1 still declares MPL-2.0, but the diff changes the package license field to PMPL-1.0-or-later. These two license declarations now conflict, leaving the effective license of the package ambiguous. Reconcile them so the SPDX identifier and the guix license field agree.

Tip

Comment Gitar fix CI to trigger a fix.

Options

Display: compact → Showing less information.

Comment with these commands to change the behavior for this request:

Compact
gitar display:verbose         

Was this helpful? React with 👍 / 👎 | Gitar

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit d138c5f into main Jul 28, 2026
17 of 18 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the fix/codeql-action-sha branch July 28, 2026 17:27
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
C Security Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant