Skip to content

fix(ci): restore reachable standards workflow pins - #174

Open
hyperpolymath wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/restore-reachable-standards-pin
Open

fix(ci): restore reachable standards workflow pins#174
hyperpolymath wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/restore-reachable-standards-pin

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Replace the unreachable standards reusable-workflow commit 7fdc2705df74b4e352d2a1cde3e87a5923fdf329 with reachable standards main commit 092dedada188f56c5915f74a5fd40aac093742c3. The old SHA is an intermediate commit from squash-merged standards PR #596: it exists, but GitHub rejects it for cross-repository reusable workflows before creating jobs. This restores Hypatia/SARIF and the other affected workflows without weakening SHA pinning or branch protection. Estate incident: 251 active workflow files across 70 repositories in hyperpolymath and metadatastician.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Team

Run ID: 0c600219-01b4-40ef-b6b2-ca328a5ba28f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2b9053c and 3745fe7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/governance.yml
  • .github/workflows/scorecard.yml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (13)
  • GitHub Check: Validate A2ML manifests
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: Validate eclexiaiser manifest
  • GitHub Check: security
  • GitHub Check: Validate K9 contracts
  • GitHub Check: Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis
  • GitHub Check: Groove manifest check
  • GitHub Check: Empty-linter (invisible characters)
  • GitHub Check: lint-workflows
  • GitHub Check: Build and test
  • GitHub Check: analyze (actions, none)
  • GitHub Check: analyze (javascript-typescript, none)
  • GitHub Check: lint-workflows
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/governance.yml (1)

34-34: LGTM!

.github/workflows/scorecard.yml (1)

19-19: LGTM!


📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the governance automation workflow to use a newer verified revision.
    • Updated the Scorecards automation workflow to use a newer verified revision.

Walkthrough

The governance and Scorecards workflows now reference the pinned commit 092dedada188f56c5915f74a5fd40aac093742c3.

Changes

Workflow pin updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update reusable workflow references
.github/workflows/governance.yml, .github/workflows/scorecard.yml
The workflows now use the newer pinned reusable workflow commit.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 3745f

The governance and Scorecards workflows now use the reachable pinned shared-workflow revision, restoring reusable workflow execution without changing workflow inputs or permissions. The change is ready to merge.

Poem

A rabbit checks the workflow pins
Two newer hashes now begin
Governance hops in line
Scorecards follows fine
The CI burrow safely spins

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description check ✅ Passed The description clearly explains the replacement of the unreachable reusable-workflow commit and the resulting CI restoration. It directly matches the changeset and objectives.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies the CI fix and the restoration of reachable workflow pins. It accurately summarises the primary change.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant