fix(ci): repair workflows that are not valid YAML and have never run - #77
Conversation
…ever parsed
The workflow declared `on:` twice, with byte-identical contents:
on:
push:
branches: [main, master]
pull_request:
once at the top and again below the `concurrency:` block. GitHub Actions
rejects duplicate keys outright, so this file has never run: `failure`, no
jobs, no log, no check run.
The second occurrence is removed. Because the two blocks were identical, there
is no question about which triggers were intended — nothing changes about when
this workflow fires.
Worth noting the shape: a guardrail comment about scoping triggers sits
between the two, so this looks like an edit that appended a corrected `on:`
block without removing the original. yaml.safe_load would have accepted it
silently, keeping the last one, which is why nothing flagged it.
Verified: all workflows in the repository parse after the change.
Part of an estate-wide repair — 67 repositories, 100 files. Detection is being
added upstream: hyperpolymath/standards#582.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan D.A. Jewell <6759885+hyperpolymath@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
Note Automatic reviews are paused because your trial's included automatic processing has been used for this period. Upgrade now, or comment "Gitar review" to run a review anytime. Code Review ✅ ApprovedRemoves a duplicated on: block in rescript-deno-ci.yml to repair malformed YAML that prevented the workflow from running. No issues found.
OptionsDisplay: compact → Showing less information. Comment with these commands to change the behavior for this request:
Important Your trial ends in 4 days — upgrade now to keep code review, CI analysis, auto-apply, custom automations, and more. Was this helpful? React with 👍 / 👎 | Gitar |
![gitar-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/827041?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
1 participant
These workflow files are not valid YAML, so they have never run. Not "ran and failed" — never ran. GitHub Actions rejects the file before creating any job: the run is recorded as
failurewith no jobs, no log and no check run, andgh pr checksshows no row at all. A red mark with nothing behind it to read.Cause
A sweep added permission declarations by line position rather than by parsing the document. Three invalid shapes resulted:
A — a mapping indented under a scalar value
read-allalready grants everythingactions: readwould, so the orphaned line is dropped and nothing is lost.B — injected inside another block
C — a literal
\nthat was never interpreted, gluing the escape'snto the key:Only a text-level writer emitting an uninterpreted escape can produce that.
Verified, not assumed
Every workflow in this repository parses after the change. The repairer refuses to write any file that does not parse and still contain jobs afterwards.
Where a job-level
permissions:line was removed, a read-only top-levelpermissions:remains, so nothing is widened — and if none would remain, the tool reports that rather than inventing one. Guessing a permission set is how you silently over-grant.Estate context
67 repositories and 100 workflow files are in this state. The most frequently broken file is
workflow-linter.yml, in 22 repositories — followed byscorecard.yml(20) anddogfood-gate.yml(13).The workflow whose job is to lint workflows was itself unparseable, so it never ran, and never caught this or anything else. The check that would have found the damage was destroyed by the same sweep that caused it.
So it cannot recur invisibly
Detection is being added upstream: a strict-YAML check in the governance reusable — hyperpolymath/standards#582. Ordinary validation cannot see this class of fault, because
yaml.safe_loadsilently accepts duplicate keys and only a full parse catches the malformed indentation.Expect this repository to get louder
Workflows that have been failing silently will now actually run, and some will find real problems that have been invisible for as long as the files have been broken.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code